Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Vera device extended attributes ?
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Vera device extended attributes ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
38 Posts 3 Posters 6.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
    #1

    Hi

    How are Vera extended attributes meant to work in Triggers ?

    I wanted a trigger on Comm Failure for a particular device. (A motion sensor)

    c1405b56-b820-4d17-8e54-d0ef37c730e8-image.png

    In PLEG I can just select any of the variables for the device and these are the items I see in the drop down list:

    urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:serviceid:SecuritySensor1
    urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:serviceid:HaDevice:1
    urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:serviceid:ZWaveDevice:1
    urn:schemas-micasaverde-com:serviceid:ZWaveNetwork:1

    93d51cc5-76fe-4ca5-a168-c620900680f2-image.png

    I can't see how to do the same in MSR ?

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbitsT Offline
      toggledbits
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @cw-kid said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

      How are Vera extended attributes meant to work in Triggers ?

      Like any other attribute, although the one you chose to highlight there (mapped_by) is for my debugging and probably useful to nobody else.

      Because Vera has so many state variables for some devices, it's not reasonable to map and copy them all right out of the gate. It would be overwhelming to most new users. If there's something you need to get to, you just need to let me know. It's really a big part of the purpose of this phase: discovering both what devices, and what data in those devices, are the most-used.

      When I fill out the per-user device configuration, you'll be able yourself to pull data that isn't published by default, enable or disable an action a specific device can perform, or even create your own mapping entirely for a device that doesn't yet have one. Future stuff.

      I'll get the comm failure variable mapped for you today.

      Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kid
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        OK thanks that sounds great.

        I have two problem motion sensors in Vera and it says "Can't Detect Device" in the UI7 GUI, for no obvious reason as the motion sensors still function fine.

        In PLEG I currently just monitor for their CommFailure = 1 and set it back to 0.

        Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

        rafale77R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cw-kidC cw-kid

          OK thanks that sounds great.

          I have two problem motion sensors in Vera and it says "Can't Detect Device" in the UI7 GUI, for no obvious reason as the motion sensors still function fine.

          In PLEG I currently just monitor for their CommFailure = 1 and set it back to 0.

          Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

          rafale77R Offline
          rafale77R Offline
          rafale77
          wrote on last edited by rafale77
          #4

          @cw-kid said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

          Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

          The vera will flag battery operated devices it fails to receive a wakeup signal for a time >2x the wakeup interval. It is a common behavior in controllers and I don't think it is new. You should see complains about this from the beginning of vera. I thought I had suggested to vera dev to change this behavior to run this flag so as not to only consider the wakeup packets but all packets as the "last alive" time to eliminate exclusive dependency on the wakeup process. I guess I was ignored. If I remember correctly made the same suggestion to z-wave.me and it got quickly implemented.

          The vera has the tendency to miss a lot of zwave traffic due to its very bizarre "maintenance" scheme whereby it sends request to every battery devices to do a network heal whenever they wakeup (wakeup NNU) which basically disables the device and the network nodes around it while it is polling them for about a minute. And the nightly heal which essentially does the same for all devices no matter how they are powered, freezing the entire network for 30min (depending on how large your network is) at least and causing luup engine hangs and crashes as the unfinished tasks accumulate. All very unique "features" of the vera. There was another thing about the battery operated devices which I had requested for the longest time to eliminate but it escapes me at the moment.

          Combine this with a weak antenna and a noisy RF environment and you get a lot of "Can't detect device"

          cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • rafale77R rafale77

            @cw-kid said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

            Its a fudge fix for Vera being crap at handling these motion sensors, seems a later firmware update at some point in time made this happen, as it never happened in the past and those sensors never use to say "Can't Detect Device".

            The vera will flag battery operated devices it fails to receive a wakeup signal for a time >2x the wakeup interval. It is a common behavior in controllers and I don't think it is new. You should see complains about this from the beginning of vera. I thought I had suggested to vera dev to change this behavior to run this flag so as not to only consider the wakeup packets but all packets as the "last alive" time to eliminate exclusive dependency on the wakeup process. I guess I was ignored. If I remember correctly made the same suggestion to z-wave.me and it got quickly implemented.

            The vera has the tendency to miss a lot of zwave traffic due to its very bizarre "maintenance" scheme whereby it sends request to every battery devices to do a network heal whenever they wakeup (wakeup NNU) which basically disables the device and the network nodes around it while it is polling them for about a minute. And the nightly heal which essentially does the same for all devices no matter how they are powered, freezing the entire network for 30min (depending on how large your network is) at least and causing luup engine hangs and crashes as the unfinished tasks accumulate. All very unique "features" of the vera. There was another thing about the battery operated devices which I had requested for the longest time to eliminate but it escapes me at the moment.

            Combine this with a weak antenna and a noisy RF environment and you get a lot of "Can't detect device"

            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @rafale77 Yes I'm sure they could of improved many things.

            I only get "Can't detect device" on mainly two motion sensor devices and its always the same two.

            I have other motion sensor devices that don't seem to have this issue or certain not all the time like these two do.

            I have polling set to 0 for all battery operated devices and their wakeup interval is 86400 / 24 hrs.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • rafale77R Offline
              rafale77R Offline
              rafale77
              wrote on last edited by rafale77
              #6

              Try also update the LastWakeupTime to be the same as LastTrip and reset the sensor failure with the setFailure command in luup code for that device or maybe even waking them up manually. I think these devices may not be waking up at all or may just happen to be waking up when your zwave network is doing something else like a heal or an nnu so it is missing them every time.

              cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rafale77R rafale77

                Try also update the LastWakeupTime to be the same as LastTrip and reset the sensor failure with the setFailure command in luup code for that device or maybe even waking them up manually. I think these devices may not be waking up at all or may just happen to be waking up when your zwave network is doing something else like a heal or an nnu so it is missing them every time.

                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                #7

                @rafale77 Looking at one of the motion sensors that has "Can't detect device" on it now, its lastwakeup time is: 1606495613 or Friday, 27 November 2020 16:46:53

                Its an Everspring SP816-1 outdoor one. Looking in its user manual it does say its maximum wakeup interval is 1 day, so I should be OK with 86400 seconds I have it set as.

                Wonder why its not waking up? It's still detecting motion events perfectly fine. Might have to take it down and check the batteries and wake it up manually.

                5caa267c-6322-4ba3-8067-ea80c5035de8-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kid
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The other problem motion sensor is a Neo Cool Cam NAS-PD02Z. I can't even see a "LastWakeup" variable / value on that device at all, it has no field for it in the GUI showing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rafale77R Offline
                    rafale77R Offline
                    rafale77
                    wrote on last edited by rafale77
                    #9

                    Yep that's the problem. The vera tags its battery operated devices as "can't detect" using this variable. For your information:
                    WakeupInterval is a parameter of the vera. It is the interval the vera is going to measure to as it expects the device to update.
                    ConfiguredWakeupInterval is a parameter stored in the device. It is the number the vera got the last time the device was configured and told the vera that's the setting it has.
                    LastWakeup is the date the last time the vera saw the device to have woken up.

                    The logic in the vera is as I said before, "if os.time() - LastWakeup > WakeupInterval*2 then set Device fail =1".... 😉
                    Now more funny... The device wakes up to its lifeline associated group. (group 1). It is possible that your device was not completely configured and that the association was not setup correctly. The best way to know is to wake the device up to see if you see the variable. If not then try reconfiguring.
                    More fun... some devices won't accept any other nodeID than "1" in this association group so if your vera's zwave has a different ID... well it will never report to the vera that it has woken up.

                    cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rafale77R rafale77

                      Yep that's the problem. The vera tags its battery operated devices as "can't detect" using this variable. For your information:
                      WakeupInterval is a parameter of the vera. It is the interval the vera is going to measure to as it expects the device to update.
                      ConfiguredWakeupInterval is a parameter stored in the device. It is the number the vera got the last time the device was configured and told the vera that's the setting it has.
                      LastWakeup is the date the last time the vera saw the device to have woken up.

                      The logic in the vera is as I said before, "if os.time() - LastWakeup > WakeupInterval*2 then set Device fail =1".... 😉
                      Now more funny... The device wakes up to its lifeline associated group. (group 1). It is possible that your device was not completely configured and that the association was not setup correctly. The best way to know is to wake the device up to see if you see the variable. If not then try reconfiguring.
                      More fun... some devices won't accept any other nodeID than "1" in this association group so if your vera's zwave has a different ID... well it will never report to the vera that it has woken up.

                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kid
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @rafale77 said in Vera device extended attributes ?:

                      WakeupInterval is a parameter of the vera. It is the interval the vera is going to measure to as it expects the device to update.
                      ConfiguredWakeupInterval is a parameter stored in the device

                      ConfiguredWakeupInterval on both of these motion sensor is
                      86400 I can see this value on each device.

                      The WakeupInterval on both of these motion sensor is
                      86400 I can see this value on each device.

                      I've just woken up the Neo Cool Cam one that had the missing LastWakeUp value and its still missing. I then polled it OK but still no LastWakeUp field showing up. Might have to try and reconfigure it.

                      As for the Everspring one outside, Vera says it hasn't woken up since November LOL. I'll have to take it down and have a look also.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • rafale77R Offline
                        rafale77R Offline
                        rafale77
                        wrote on last edited by rafale77
                        #11

                        Idea popping in my head to make this behave more like z-way... have a scene to update the LastWakeup variable every time the Tripped variable changes... That would be a quick patch to overcome the stupidity of the firmware.

                        cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • rafale77R rafale77

                          Idea popping in my head to make this behave more like z-way... have a scene to update the LastWakeup variable every time the Tripped variable changes... That would be a quick patch to overcome the stupidity of the firmware.

                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @rafale77 Sounds like a good idea.

                          If I could have a MSR rule do this? even better.

                          rafale77R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cw-kidC cw-kid

                            @rafale77 Sounds like a good idea.

                            If I could have a MSR rule do this? even better.

                            rafale77R Offline
                            rafale77R Offline
                            rafale77
                            wrote on last edited by rafale77
                            #13

                            @cw-kid

                            It's possible to do it on the MSR but this is the version on the vera:

                            1. Create a scene with trigger being your sensor's tripped event (tripped or untripped)
                            2. Add the following lua code as the scene lua:
                            local dev = --the device id of the sensor--
                            local t = os.time()
                            luup.variable_set("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveDevice1", "LastWakeup", t, dev)
                            if luup.variable_get("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1", "CommFailure", dev)=="1" then
                              luup.set_failure(false,dev)
                            end
                            

                            Done...

                            You could possibly even implement this to all sensors by making it a function and set a variable watch on all the tripped values in the startup lua... After this, you would also have to run

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kid
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Great thank you. I will give it a try.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kid
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Just tried the code in the Vera test window against the outdoor Everspring motion sensor. It works. Its updated its lastwakeup value to just now and gotten rid of the "Can'r detect device" red banner also.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kid
                                  wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                  #16

                                  I ran the code against the other Neo Cool Cam motion sensor with the missing LastWakeUp field and now that field is present and up to date with that time stamp.

                                  I've setup two functions in the Vera startup for each motion sensor to run this LUA code and two MSR rules to trigger upon their motion being tripped etc.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • cw-kidC Offline
                                    cw-kidC Offline
                                    cw-kid
                                    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                    #17

                                    But the "Can't Detect Device" error comes back again shortly after the motion sensor has been untripped for a while.

                                    5592b768-9242-480f-a18a-be843dcf51f1-image.png

                                    Damn you Vera firmware haha.

                                    As soon as its tripped it goes away, with what we have setup

                                    c23296a1-50eb-4aa1-8ab5-822da12bb0d7-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rafale77R Offline
                                      rafale77R Offline
                                      rafale77
                                      wrote on last edited by rafale77
                                      #18

                                      Note that if you don't trip these sensors regularly, you will still see a problem eventually so it is best to fix the wakeup. If they get tripped regularly then you don't need to worry too much about it.

                                      On your last edit: Please ensure to use the code I updated. I made a mistake the first time around using the wrong service ID.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cw-kidC Offline
                                        cw-kidC Offline
                                        cw-kid
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        This is what I have in the functions:

                                        -- Porch Motion Sensor Fix LastWakeUp and Can't Detect Device Errors
                                        function PorchMotionSensorFix() 
                                           luup.log('VeraScenes.PorchMotionSensorFix')
                                           local dev = 304
                                           local t = os.time()
                                           luup.variable_set("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveDevice1", "LastWakeup", t, dev)
                                           if luup.variable_get("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1", "CommFailure", dev)=="1" then
                                           luup.set_failure(false,dev)
                                           end
                                        end
                                        
                                        -- Lounge Motion Sensor Fix LastWakeUp and Can't Detect Device Errors
                                        function LoungeMotionSensorFix()
                                           luup.log('VeraScenes.LoungeMotionSensorFix')
                                           local dev = 331
                                           local t = os.time()
                                           luup.variable_set("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:ZWaveDevice1", "LastWakeup", t, dev)
                                           if luup.variable_get("urn:micasaverde-com:serviceId:HaDevice1", "CommFailure", dev)=="1" then
                                           luup.set_failure(false,dev)
                                           end
                                        end
                                        
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rafale77R Offline
                                          rafale77R Offline
                                          rafale77
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Yup it should work. I don't see why it would flag them as failed again... The firmware checks every 10min so you have to wait 10min to be sure it doesn't come back.

                                          cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            30

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            24

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            1
                                            25

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            55

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            73

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            92

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            71

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            133
                                            80.0k

                                          • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            1
                                            9
                                            379

                                          • Copying a global reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            3
                                            114

                                          • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            9
                                            447

                                          • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            165
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved