@toggledbits yes that was the problem, thanks on the fix.
Best regards
E
eonnet
@eonnet
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration:
users:
# This section defines your valid users.
admin: *******
groups:
# This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application
# and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to
# more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here.
admin_group:
users:
- admin
applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications
guests:
users: "*"
applications:
- dashboard
api_acls:
# This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API
- url: "/api"
group: admin_group
allow: true
log: true
# This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint
- url: "/api/v1/alive"
allow: true
session:
timeout: 7200 # (seconds)
rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true
# If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged.
log_acls: true
# If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged.
debug_acls: true
My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules.
I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds).
Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off?
With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches.
Thanks
Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7
VirtualEntityController v25356
Synology Docker
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future.
In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level.
Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way.
I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption.
A few other things to know:
If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc.
Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy).
The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON.
You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach).
The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case.
This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change.
This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks.
Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option?
No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices
Cheers
C
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here.
Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions;
Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating;
Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later;
Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase;
Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions;
Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases);
Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Just for the record, in case anyone is following, I'm really rather impressed.
I have installed one of these:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0B6P22YJC?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1
That's connected (physically) to the VM running on my Synology, with a 2m USB extension.
The same host also runs Openluup, Mosquito, HA Bridge.
Yesterday I installed Zigbee2mqtt. That was a bit of a PITA but mostly because of ports and permissions.
Once up and running, and the correct boxes ticked, immediately visible in Home Assistant via the MQTT integration, and thence into Reactor
I've only got two devices. I bought the cheapest sensor I could find, which is a door sensor. Dead easy to add to ZIgbee2mqtt and again, immediately visible in HA.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FPQLWRW1?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title
The dongle is on the top floor of the house, and I wanted the sensor on the back door (just about as far apart as it's possible to get short of going into the garage) When I moved the sensor downstairs it dropped out pretty instantly (which wasn't a huge surprise) so quick bit of research found out that smart plugs will act as routers so...
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0FDQDPGBB?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title
Took me about 30 seconds to connect. Updated the name. Instantly visible in Reactor with the new name pushed over from Zigbee2mqtt.
And lo, the door sensor now has a signal of 140 and works as far as I can tell perfectly and instantly (unlike my z-wave one).
A few more of those will be purchased and used to replace the Tuya wifi cloud devices and the (continually failing) Z-wave plugs (yeah, they were TKB so....)
Commended to the house. Thanks for everyone that got me on the right lines.
C
If you’re like me and still running HABridge to control your devices locally via Alexa, you might need to tweak your endpoints to call Reactor via HTTP. Here’s the best way to do it, IMO:
Insert the Reactor Canonical ID (e.g., zwavejs>71-1) into the MapID field, but make sure it’s URL-encoded like this: zwavejs%3E71-1.
Then, configure these endpoints as needed:
On: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/power_switch.on
Off: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/power_switch.off
Dim:
For lights: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/dimming.set?level=${intensity.decimal_percent}
For roller shutters: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/position.set?value=${intensity.decimal_percent}
Color: http://[ReactorIP]:8111/api/v1/entity/${device.mapId}/perform/rgb_color.set_rgb?red=${color.r}&green=${color.g}&blue=${color.b}
Just replace [ReactorIP] with your actual IP address. By using these placeholders, you can standardize your endpoints across all devices, making maintenance easier.
This setup works with any device mapped under MSR, regardless of the controller (ZWaveJS, Vera, HASS, OpenSprinkler, virtual, MQTT, DynamicEntities, etc.). If you need different calls, just go to the entities, get the action and parameters, and adjust accordingly. Enjoy super fast access to your devices via Alexa!
If you're migrating from Vera, the endpoints are (URL-encoded) in a file called device.db, in JSON format, under your config. You'd write a script to align the new endpoints to the new one, if you prefer to do it automatically. YMMV.
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Good evening all,
For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time.
Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed.
Thanks.
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations.
Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction?
Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for.
I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue.
TIA!
C
Posts
-
Issue with HTTP API -
Issue with HTTP API@toggledbits here is the log
[latest-22328]2022-11-30T19:58:30.832Z httpapi:ERR httpapi: perform hvac_heating_unit.set_setpoint on Thermostat#hass>climate_vivax failed: [TypeError]Typ>
[latest-22328]2022-11-30T19:58:30.834Z httpapi:CRIT TypeError: Type mismatch on config reactor.engine.monitored_entities, expecting array, got object
TypeError: Type mismatch on config reactor.engine.monitored_entities, expecting array, got object
at Configuration.getConfig (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Configuration.js:163:23)
at Function.getConfig (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Configuration.js:151:82)
at HTTPAPI._handlePerformRequest (/opt/reactor/server/lib/httpapi.js:834:56)
at /opt/reactor/server/lib/httpapi.js:396:61
at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5)
at next (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/route.js:144:13)
at Route.dispatch (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/route.js:114:3)
at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5)
at /opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:284:15
at param (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:365:14)and another on with different request
[latest-22328]2022-11-30T20:02:22.335Z httpapi:ERR httpapi: perform hvac_control.set_mode on Thermostat#hass>climate_vivax failed: [TypeError]TypeError: T>
[latest-22328]2022-11-30T20:02:22.336Z httpapi:CRIT TypeError: Type mismatch on config reactor.engine.monitored_entities, expecting array, got object
TypeError: Type mismatch on config reactor.engine.monitored_entities, expecting array, got object
at Configuration.getConfig (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Configuration.js:163:23)
at Function.getConfig (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Configuration.js:151:82)
at HTTPAPI._handlePerformRequest (/opt/reactor/server/lib/httpapi.js:834:56)
at /opt/reactor/server/lib/httpapi.js:396:61
at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5)
at next (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/route.js:144:13)
at Route.dispatch (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/route.js:114:3)
at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5)
at /opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:284:15
at param (/opt/reactor/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:365:14) -
Issue with HTTP APII tried tonight with curl and postman i get the same response
request failed
no further info.... this is only happening when i try to make a request to entity.I also tried to make a reaction with the http request to reactor and the response is:
Reaction "re-lb2sork5" (re-lb2sork5) step 1 http request failed
Error: HTTP request failed: 400 Bad RequestI hope this gives you more info
-
Issue with HTTP APIHello @toggledbits im trying to control reactor from external source, for this example i'm using web browser.
(this is example for the docker installation on ubuntu server)
When i hit a web page http://192.168.0.39:8111/api/v1/entity/hass_container>climate_vivax/perform/hvac_heating_unit.set_setpoint?setpoint=26
i get a response
'Request failed'
and the action is not executedWhen i hit a web page http://192.168.0.39:8111/api/v1/reaction/re-lb1bejbo/run
i get response
{"status":true,"message":"Vivax Off started"}
and the action is executedOn the unraid server docker installation when i hit http://192.168.0.81:8111/api/v1/entity/hass>climate_vivax/perform/hvac_heating_unit.set_setpoint?setpoint=26
i recieve a response
{"status":true,"message":"Performed hvac_heating_unit.set_setpoint on Thermostat#hass>climate_vivax"}
and the action is executedwhen i hit http://eonnet.duckdns.org:8112/api/v1/entity/hass>climate_vivax/perform/hvac_control.set_mode?mode=off
i recieve a response
{"status":true,"message":"Performed hvac_control.set_mode on Thermostat#hass>climate_vivax"}
and the action is executed.Best regards
-
Issue with HTTP APIHello @toggledbits I have a strange issue with the HTTP request that i send to Reactor.
I have two reactors one on a Unraid server and one on Ubuntu server installed as a docker, when i send http get request to the Unraid server to control home assistant entity everything is going ok, but when i send the same request to the ubuntu modified accordingly it says "Request failed" but when i try to run reaction via http request it works.When i go to entities and try to control the entity manually its working.
Any idea's?
Best regards
-
Who are my Home Assistant + ZWave-JS users?@vezinpi yes hassos
-
Who are my Home Assistant + ZWave-JS users?@vezinpi in addon settings add 3000 port to the host.
And than you can access the zwavejs2mqtt addon via ws://ip:3000 -
Who are my Home Assistant + ZWave-JS users?Hello, i managed to connect the HA add on to reactor. The first thing i noticed is that mappings for fan on ZXT-600 and ZXT-120 IR extender for AC are incorrect, on reactor are as follows: 0-off, 1 - auto, 2 - continuous, 3 - periodic, 4 - low, 5 - medium, 6 - high, in zwavejs web console are 0 - Auto low, 1- Low, 3 - High, 5 - Medium
-
Who are my Home Assistant + ZWave-JS users?Hello, i'm running zwavejs2mqtt addon on Home Assistant and the addon don't allow to connect to the addon via IP address. Is there a solution for this or i'm out of luck?
I'm running my Reactor on a docker on Unraid, and home assistant os as a VM on the unraid, i can't install docker zwavejs2mqtt because for some unknown reason my zwave stick loses a connection with the docker after couple of days and cant find the solution for that.
cheers
-
Who are my Home Assistant + ZWave-JS users?I’m using HA with zwavejs2mqtt addon
-
Considering changing to HA - but what installation method?@perh The addon menu is just a docker containers, you have all of them as a separate docker which you can install.
-
ezmqtt switch control questions/issuesThanks, found the problem updated and its working, in your instruction for installation the container is named toggledbits/ezmqtt:latest-generic-amd64 and in the docker hub latest version is toggledbits/ezmqtt:latest-amd64, that is why it didnt update.
cheers
-
ezmqtt switch control questions/issuesHello @toggledbits i run ezmqtt in a docker, updated to the latest version and still have the same issue:
here is the error in the log that i recieveat EzloClient.handle_message (/opt/ezmqtt/lib/ezlo.js:664:25)
at /opt/ezmqtt/lib/wsclient.js:233:29
at new Promise (<anonymous>)
at WSClient.trigger (/opt/ezmqtt/lib/wsclient.js:229:16)
at WebSocket.<anonymous> (/opt/ezmqtt/lib/wsclient.js:76:30)
at WebSocket.emit (node:events:390:28)
at Receiver.receiverOnMessage (/opt/ezmqtt/node_modules/ws/lib/websocket.js:1008:20)
at Receiver.emit (node:events:390:28)
at Receiver.dataMessage (/opt/ezmqtt/node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:517:14)
at Receiver.getData (/opt/ezmqtt/node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:435:17) {
code: -32602,
reason:Unexpected Json format for value type 'bool': ["true","true"]
}
mqtt: <ezmqtt/set/device/61e8937e124c35129921171d/item/switch true> failed; Wrong field of object (-32602): Unexpected Json format for value type 'bool': ["true","true"]I send plain payload true on topic ezmqtt/set/device/61e8937e124c35129921171d/item/switch.
version that is shown in the log file is Version 21357
cheers
-
ezmqtt switch control questions/issuesHi @toggledbits,
i tried the ezmqtt today, i have some issues most likely that i'm doing something wrong.
i have on my ezlo hub 3 switches, 1 dimmer and 1 motion sensor
i can control the dimmer via ezmqtt/set/device/<device-id>/item/<item-name>
but i can't control the switches.i receive on ezmqtt/tele/device/61e8937e124c35129921171d/item/switch payload true or false depending on the state of the switch, but when i send on ezmqtt/set/device/61e8937e124c35129921171d/item/switch payload true or false nothing happens, its the same for all switches.
what i'm doing wrong?
Cheers
-
New toys to play with@crille i haven’t tried it wit ezmqtt i intend to try it today, but have tried it with zwavejs2mqtt and its pretty smooth.
-
New toys to play with@crille you can use the mqttthing plugin on homebridge
-
Sustained condition is missing from MSRThanks both @toggledbits and @Elcid. I will use the @toggledbits idea because i dont need instantaneous feedback from ezlo.
Did anybody tested ezlo with higher number of devices how it compares with Vera? i have around 50 zwave devices and when i turn on scene with multiple devices sometimes it takes 1 minute scene to complete, i get a lot of retries especially with the dimmers, the zwave network is good because the 50 devices are in 60 sqm apartment on 2 floors so 50 devices make excellent mesh
90% of the devices are mains powered.My idea is to use Ezlo hub for zwave devices and transfer them to Control4 via HTTP calls. that is why i will use @toggledbits solution because ezlo -> Control4 is just for feedback i dont need instantaneous response, from C4 -> Ezlo i will use direct http call so that will be instant
-
Sustained condition is missing from MSR@toggledbits said in Sustained condition is missing from MSR:
So, you want to do something when it has not changed for 3 seconds... think about how to structure that.
What i'm trying to do is to import ezlo dimmer in vera and have 2 way communication. If i do action on change without sustain sometimes it goes in a loop, so i want to make sure that dimmer has reached the level and stayed on that level for couple of seconds before i send the information back to vera. In vera i'm using your virtual dimmer. But for some reason when you turn on ezlo the dimmers make a short stop for couple of hundred milliseconds somewhere in between causes a race between the two dimmers.
-
Sustained condition is missing from MSRWhat should i choose, what i'm trying to achieve is that when dimmer level changes and stays for example 35% for 3 seconds pass the dimmer level to a http call