Skip to content

Multi-System Reactor

767 Topics 7.3k Posts
  • Category Topic Guide -- Read Before Posting

    Pinned Locked
    1
    8 Votes
    1 Posts
    747 Views
    No one has replied
  • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements

    Pinned Locked
    116
    5 Votes
    116 Posts
    16k Views
    toggledbitsT
    Reactor build 25016

    HOME ASSISTANT NOTE: Versions of Home Assistant earlier that 2024.1.0 are no longer supported. They may continue to work, but I won't be troubleshooting any issues that come up with them. Generally speaking, HA releases are supported one year in arears from current.

    NODEJS V18 EOL: If you are using nodejs version 18, it will go off maintenance on April 15, 2025, and is therefore now deprecated. Please update to a more recent version before this date. Even-numbered LTS versions are recommended. Version 20 will go EOL in April 2026, and version 22 (recommended) in 2028.

    Reaction List: Fix an error thrown when creating a new Reaction. Dashboard: improve display of ValueSensor class objects for capabilities temperature_sensor, humidity_sensor, battery_level, and volume. HassController: Support new vacuum activity attribute and values (see HA 2025.1 release info). HassController: Support state for lawn mowers. HassController: Add x_hass_system.reload_configuration and x_hass_system.restart actions. HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.1.2
  • Local notification methods?

    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    151 Views
    toggledbitsT

    @therealdb said in Local notification methods?:

    @toggledbits time for a custom mqtt template

    LOL! I think for one topic, it might be a bit of overkill, but then, that's kind of how we roll, isn't it?

  • Custom capabilities in MQTT templates

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    148 Views
    toggledbitsT

    That is cool. I really love stuff that combines simple, available IoT bits with the old greasy bits to solve problems. It appeals to my libertarian steampunk fantasy of how I'd run my home, which unfortunately far exceeds my wife's tolerance for the lower limits of luxury over sustainability. 😆

  • [SOLVED]Hass websocket falsely reporting ready on boot??

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    193 Views
    toggledbitsT

    The alerts persisting is a sync problem with the alerts data object. I've found and (hopefully) fixed it for the next build. Both it and the Controller Status widget need special handing when the API connection is restarted.

  • [SOLVED]Logs permissions for Docker Install

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    112 Views
    toggledbitsT

    @vezinpi said in [SOLVED]Logs permissions for Docker Install:

    from the dist-config/logging.yaml that the default is 0644 (which would work just fine)

    Yes, and that needs to read 0o644 now -- I've fixed that for the next build. The default is actually 0o640 in the code, so I've fixed the distribution template for that as well.

  • Button.Since Revisited

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    49 Views
    No one has replied
  • [SOLVED] reactor_inet_check script... and containers

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    207 Views
    CatmanV2C

    Oooh thanks!

    C

  • Catch-all lights rule

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    95 Views
    G

    @toggledbits sorry for the delay, day job has a rude habit of interfering in fun.

    This solution worked perfectly for this need. It's actually quite similar to how I control the outdoor garden fountain, HVAC, and some other things. As usual, I tried to over-complicate things.

    EDIT: in fact, I find I am using this EXACT method for my outdoor LIFX lights. sigh

    I am still looking for that context. Will provide when I locate it.

  • Throttled problem

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    177 Views
    toggledbitsT

    OK. That's enough info to determine it's a NUT problem (or driver problem), at least.

    You may want to look at this. You should be troubleshooting at the Network UPS Tools level, looking at your (operating) system log files. Restarting the service isn't going to fix it.

  • Dynamic Alert Based on Tripped Expression

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    72 Views
    T

    This is fantastic (and I’m sure is covered in the manual - oops). Thank you, @tunnus

  • latest-25016 toggle.toggle on VeraController Lock entity not working

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    84 Views
    CrilleC

    Thank you! toggle.toggle is back in business.

  • [Solved] Local expression evaluation

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    95 Views
    V

    @tunnus @toggledbits Thank you both for all your explanation.

    Much appreciated.

  • [Solved] Migrating MSR to Docker on Proxmox

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    280 Views
    G

    To bring this all full circle, I had installed Portainer just to see what it was/did. Rereading the manual for MSR I stumbled across Portainer-specific instructions.

    Short story long, I deleted the original container and created a new one thru the Portainer path. Done in mere minutes, runs flawlessly and I don't need to worry about the docker-compose errors I was getting.

    Going to mark this topic as solved as all of the three issues were addressed.

  • Runtime error latest-24366 when Create New Reaction

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    112 Views
    B

    Confirming that 25016 has indeed resolved the error.

    Thank you !!

  • Vera reload detected where there does not appear to be one.

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    140 Views
    CatmanV2C

    That's fabulously clear. Thanks, as ever

    C

  • Has something changed with the "Changes" operator in Constraint groups ?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    132 Views
    cw-kidC

    OK thanks, I think that works!

    So I have two rules now the main 1st rule that detects Motion on the IP Camera and also a Virtual Switch must be True, those are the two triggers, this is the rule with the Actions in it.

    In the Constraints I am referencing the "Rule State" of the 2nd new rule and that must be False.

    ffb990d2-5b0f-419f-88e3-4cde28ed51b0-image.png

    This is the new 2nd rule and I have just used the Triggers with the "Changes" operator.

    So if any of these devices change their state within the X number of Seconds the OR group will be True thus the 1st main rule would NOT run its Actions in that case.

    But if none of these devices have changed their state within the X number of Seconds the OR group will be False thus the 1st main rule would run its Actions.

    e972131c-82e8-44b6-819f-dfe9a217692a-image.png

  • Reactor-Editor / Reactor-ui-Status Errors

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    414 Views
    V

    Thanks for the update and sorry about the timeout issue, I was not aware of it.

    Here is the requested rule:

    ac60b96d-b639-4baf-95d4-853332bc62be-image.png

    10cbe2e7-0af9-4ede-afa8-060b0f99befe-image.png

    f9282548-9462-4c52-a125-dc57fc9c3fa6-image.png

  • [Solved] Error dialog running reaction in build 24302

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    151 Views
    toggledbitsT

    @vezinpi said in Reactor-Editor / Reactor-ui-Status Errors:

    Not sure that it is the same issue but just got this on built 24302 when running a reaction for testing purpose. Despite the error message, the reaction ran properly.

    That was fixed in 24343. The reaction apparently runs long (lots of delays?), so it was causing the API to time out waiting for the reaction to finish. All works differently in 24343 and beyond.

  • every X days field uneditable

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    185 Views
    G

    @tunnus yes, the rule is working and @toggledbits indicated as such (that it would work) but he raised a potential issue regarding the crossing of midnight that I was asking about there being a better approach.

Recent Topics