Skip to content

Multi-System Reactor

751 Topics 7.2k Posts
  • 0 Votes
    12 Posts
    411 Views
    therealdbT

    For me a "for/foreach" could be useful as well, when dealing with multiple devices and the same actions. Now this part is all code.

  • MSR, Repeat While not evaluated?

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    116 Views
    M

    Redesign in progress. Thanks again for this great multi platform tool.

  • Need some advice how to fix a rule that throttles sometimes.

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    131 Views
    toggledbitsT

    @Andr said in Need some advice how to fix a rule that throttles sometimes.:

    I had understand it that if Constraints isn't true, then the triggers isn't evaluated.

    Nope. The triggers are evaluated first. If they are satisfied, then the constraints are examined. So that 180 updates per minute from the Shelly is what's causing the throttling.

    You need to reduce the frequency of updates from the source device to the rule. Since you seem to only care about the power over a period of 10 seconds, you could use the time series features of VirtualEntityController and produce, for example, a 10-second moving average. The VEC will gobble update the individual updates from the Shelly and drive virtual sensors that advertise the moving average, per phase. Your rule can then check the average from the virtual sensors (you probably don't need sustained for at that point, because the moving average contains the time component). Depending on how "bouncy" the source power readings are, it may still update a lot, but you can tune/dampen that by playing with the precision (e.g. set precision: -1 to round to nearest 10 watts).

  • Delete many entities more efficient?

    Locked Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    149 Views
    F

    @toggledbits Thanks! This is the solution I was looking for, since I'm not that patient... 🙂

  • Fail safe condition for battery devices

    Locked
    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    428 Views
    toggledbitsT

    Yes, between or not between as your logic requires, but the idea is the same.

  • Aeon MultiSensor 6 missing motion capabilities in ZWaveJS entries

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    88 Views
    T

    @toggledbits
    That did the trick, thanks!

  • Interval condition question

    Locked Solved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    80 Views
    tunnusT

    @toggledbits thanks, didn't think about that

  • Feature request: direct links to dashboard items

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    107 Views
    tunnusT

    @toggledbits as dashboard items are now all under URL <MSR ip>:8111/dashboard/, if e.g. virtual items/switches would be under <MSR ip>:8111/dashboard/virtual/, they could be accessed with a direct (bookmarkable) link

  • Feature Request: Sublevel in Rulesets

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    87 Views
    No one has replied
  • Envisalink Controller - DSC

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    97 Views
    T

    @toggledbits, thanks, that's what I was thinking, and yeah, I've been burned a time or two by HA changing things around. Just this past week I got a notice about OpenWeatherMap's API changing. Not really their fault, but you have to keep on top of this stuff

  • [Solved]. in, not in

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    149 Views
    G

    Marking this as closed, filed under "quirky" lol

  • Having an issue with calling a HA service from MSR

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    264 Views
    M

    That did it. Thanks for your help.

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    538 Views
    CrilleC

    It's the same for dimming.set and power_switch.set all .set, an entity rebuild solves those too with 24162.

    (@toggledbits Mantis ID 372)

  • [Dev] Inheritance in MQTT templates?

    Locked
    40
    1 Votes
    40 Posts
    976 Views
    CrilleC

    Yep, all warnings gone! Thank you for all your work!

  • Need Testers

    Locked
    78
    1 Votes
    78 Posts
    4k Views
    toggledbitsT

    The userauth branch has now been merged into the main line release path (latest), and released in build 24152. This topic is now closed. Open new topics for any new issues.

    Thanks to all of you for your work in testing these changes.

  • [Solved] Entities error when updating MQTTController from 24120 to 24142

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    221 Views
    CrilleC

    Understood! Reverted to 24120. All good.
    Thanks for the heads up on the localization file.

  • VirtualEntityController & time series

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    278 Views
    toggledbitsT

    Yup, I'd expect that, based on my testing. All aggregates are working except weighted average.

    Two issues, first, a doc error, it should be wa for the aggregate name, not wma.

    Second issue, computation is botched, so it will give a value, but it's incorrect. But the brain-fade on my part was simple, and you can easily work around it until I get the next build out: add expr: "value*X" where X is the depth you've requested (e.g. 4).

    Next build will fix it, but remember to remove the expression workaround when you install it.

    (I know there are five samples, but "depth" should handle that?)

    Correct!

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    186 Views
    T

    @toggledbits,
    Thank you Patrick. It's not throwing an alert now. Very elegant solution.

    I'll verify that it works once I get in the car after work and marked the thread as solved.

  • Low battery Alert using Dynamic Group Controller

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    131 Views
    T

    Solved: Figured it out myself. I needed to add - include_group: "zwavejs" into the yaml file. This took out most of the extraneous entries that are battery powered.

    I still had a couple of ghost zwavejs nodes that I needed to manually remove. I may have to try and reset the zwavejs db somehow and get a clean reading of all the devices.

  • MQTT action & expressions

    Locked Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    231 Views
    tunnusT

    @therealdb & @toggledbits it wasn't that easy... I finally got this working, but it took a couple of iterations. Correct version below:

    pool_set_temp: capabilities: [ hvac_heating_unit ] primary_attribute: hvac_heating_unit.setpoint actions: hvac_heating_unit: set_setpoint: topic: "pool/set" payload: type: json expr: '{ "command": 4, "value": min( 30, max( 20, int( parameters.setpoint ) ) ), "time": 0, "interval": 0 }'

    Devil is in the details I guess.

Recent Topics