Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. System integration roadmap
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with screne controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor
Expose MSR entities
CatmanV2C
Probably a really dumb question. Currently I am using the owntracks_sensor for tracking phones being in region in MSR and it works great. Digging around with Home Assistant and toying with some dashboards, is there any way of exposing that sensor to HA trivially? I could set MSR to trip a virtual switch in OpenLuup which can then be exposed to HA (with all my other Vera devices) but that feels a bit in-elegant if I can do it directly. Any thoughts? Apologies if the ask is not clear/ TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Comment in Globa Expressions
Tom_DT
I have several Global Expressions that are set by a rule so the definition area is blank. I'd like to add a comment in this area that explains what is setting the value. Commenting in this area breaks the remote setting. Any way to document what is setting the GE?
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Gradually turn on lights.
Tom_DT
I have several lights that I would like to turn on very gradually over 15 or 20 seconds. from 0 to .25 in .01 increments. I have tried a few things that came nowhere near working, so here I am.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can't customize home page
G
I foolishly let my system wipe all cookies this morning and with it my settings for my MSR home page. Once logged back in I can no longer remove errant panes nor is the + available to add new ones. Brave Browser v1.80.122 (Jul 16, 2025) What have I done?! Will check other browsers on my M1. UPDATE: Safari exhibits same behaviour. I've tried both sans last-four public key entry and with - no change.
Multi-System Reactor
Error After Upgrade
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset attribute value of entity in event handler
R
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help figuring out how to delay a reset on reaction
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Way to search for rules (rule state) in other rules
T
@toggledbits, not sure if this is a feature request or I'm using the search tool wrong. You have a "Search for rule" in the Rules Set tab in MSR. It works nicely to find a rule and bring up said rule, but can it/could it be used for as a "where used?" global search? For instance, I have a fairly large set of rules, divided up into 10 different rulesets. There's easily a hundred individual rules, and many of the rules have Rule State triggers, which of course refer to other rules. Amongst my troubleshooting today, I came across what may have been a duplicate or troubleshooting attempt, but I can't tell if it's actually used as a Rule State in another rule without opening each rule that I suspect it may be a part of. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor

System integration roadmap

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
21 Posts 10 Posters 2.9k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

    The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

    This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

    So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    therealdbT cw-kidC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSunL Offline
      LibraSun
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      I volunteer to:

      1. Hammer on all things msr/vera as released.
      2. Proofread any and all documentation.
      3. Continue filing bug reports with full data.
      4. Periodically send Patrick some beer money! ◄– as should everyone who respects his time and energy 🐶
      MatohlM 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • CatmanV2C Offline
        CatmanV2C Offline
        CatmanV2
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        In addition to 4 can I volunteer to stand around, sucking my teeth? 😉

        C

        The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • LibraSunL LibraSun

          I volunteer to:

          1. Hammer on all things msr/vera as released.
          2. Proofread any and all documentation.
          3. Continue filing bug reports with full data.
          4. Periodically send Patrick some beer money! ◄– as should everyone who respects his time and energy 🐶
          MatohlM Offline
          MatohlM Offline
          Matohl
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @librasun said in System integration roadmap:

          Periodically send Patrick some beer money! ◄– as should everyone who respects his time and energy

          Done

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • rafale77R Offline
            rafale77R Offline
            rafale77
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            From what I recall he likes Scotch better...

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

              The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

              This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

              So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

              therealdbT Offline
              therealdbT Offline
              therealdb
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              @toggledbits I’m more than happy to do mqtt and ha-bridge, to start. I’ve some open source time to invest (because I love to give back) and I’ll be more than happy to help.

              --
              On a mission to automate everything.

              My MS Reactor contrib
              My Luup Plug-ins

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • PerHP Offline
                PerHP Offline
                PerH
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                I'd like to try a Domoticz integration, but spring usually brings more outdoor projects.. some day!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  cokeman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  I'd love to see a docker addon for HA...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kidC Offline
                    cw-kid
                    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                    #13

                    I'd like for the Home Remote dashboard app to support the MSR API. So I could add an MSR device object in to the Home Remote Designer and then see all my Global Reactions (Scenes) that are in MSR etc. I could then easily create dashboard "Scene" tiles to run these MSR Global Reactions from my dashboard interface.

                    But obviously that would be down to the Home Remote developer to add native support for it.

                    I was able to add a "HTTP Switch" in to the Home Remote Designer and send one HTTP command to MSR when the switch was turned ON in the dashboard app and send another HTTP command when the switch was turned OFF etc.

                    Using commands like:

                    http://MSR-IP:8111/api/v1/reaction/re-klkn8rxw/run
                    

                    It worked but I can see it being very time consuming creating these types of HTTP switches in the Home Remote dashboard, as its basically a plugin script in Home Remote and not the easiest thing to scale up and just create a load of new switches that can run various MSR Global Reactions.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

                      The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

                      This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

                      So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kid
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @toggledbits said in System integration roadmap:

                      The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.
                      This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera

                      Please can you explain this in more simple terms for us dummies.

                      Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                      All that devices various ServiceID's and variables ?

                      Thanks

                      toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cw-kidC cw-kid

                        @toggledbits said in System integration roadmap:

                        The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.
                        This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera

                        Please can you explain this in more simple terms for us dummies.

                        Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                        All that devices various ServiceID's and variables ?

                        Thanks

                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbitsT Offline
                        toggledbits
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        @cw-kid said in System integration roadmap:

                        Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                        Yes. In that respect, same as Reactor for Vera. Not user-friendly, but complete. The system-defined capabilities will still be there, like power_switch and dimming. You will able to use either.

                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          OK well that's a good thing then. Will make it like PLEG also in that respect, where you can see and choose all ServiceID's and variables.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • LibraSunL Offline
                            LibraSunL Offline
                            LibraSun
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            I'd love to see native Google Calendar integration (in much the same way that GCal 3 plug-in currently offers I/O to a designated Google Calendar).

                            Fun way to track past events and preset future triggers dynamically.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Matteburk
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Reolink Cameras with NVR ... would be lovely to trigger stuff with....

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • LibraSunL Offline
                                LibraSunL Offline
                                LibraSun
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Heck, if we're heading in that direction, then I toss RING Cameras and Doorbells into the hat. I realize that's a tall order from every perspective.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kid
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  Do those camera systems not have their own HTTP API ?

                                  I have Hikvision cameras and they have a HTTP API for controlling aspects of the cameras. So Vera and MSR or anything else can control them via HTTP requests.

                                  Turning on / off motion detection for example or starting a manual recording.

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cw-kidC cw-kid

                                    Do those camera systems not have their own HTTP API ?

                                    I have Hikvision cameras and they have a HTTP API for controlling aspects of the cameras. So Vera and MSR or anything else can control them via HTTP requests.

                                    Turning on / off motion detection for example or starting a manual recording.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Matteburk
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @cw-kid This is what I found
                                    https://support.reolink.com/hc/en-us/article_attachments/900001038146/CGI_command.pdf

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    Recent Topics

                                    • Caution: zwave-js-ui docker 11.4.0 is broken
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      2
                                      11

                                    • [Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      68
                                      4.8k

                                    • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                      therealdbT
                                      therealdb
                                      2
                                      6
                                      83

                                    • Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
                                      PablaP
                                      Pabla
                                      0
                                      5
                                      71

                                    • Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      6
                                      128

                                    • [MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
                                      therealdbT
                                      therealdb
                                      1
                                      46
                                      8.2k

                                    • HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      2
                                      85

                                    • The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      7
                                      351

                                    • Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      1
                                      2
                                      231

                                    • [Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
                                      therealdbT
                                      therealdb
                                      0
                                      1
                                      299

                                    • [Reactor] Help with screne controller cycling logic
                                      toggledbitsT
                                      toggledbits
                                      0
                                      5
                                      402

                                    • Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
                                      Tom_DT
                                      Tom_D
                                      0
                                      6
                                      735
                                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                    Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Unsolved