Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. System integration roadmap
Error: Command timeout
G
at _ClientAPI._commandTimeout (http://192.168.1.100:8111/client/ClientAPI.js:807:179 Seeing this randomly when returning to open browser tab after being away awhile. Once, maybe twice a day. "What did you do to trigger it?" Literally nothing, just walked away and returned and there it was. Actions taken in reasonably close proximity to this particular instance of it popping up: I'd restarted the MSR container in Portainer. I'll try to grab some logs here shortly.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
toggledbitsT
This post does not apply to users of Intel/AMD-based systems. If you are using a Reactor image tagged latest-amd64 or stable-amd64, then this post does not apply to you. It also does not apply to bare-metal installs; it's for users of docker images on ARM-based systems only (principally Raspberry Pi hosts, but could be others). After January 15, 2026, I will no longer produce the aarch64-tagged docker image for Reactor. The ARM images will be arm64 for 64-bit operating systems, and armv7l for 32-bit operating systems. For those of you running a container from the aarch64 image today, this will be a relatively simple change: you just need to switch the image used for your docker container to a differently-tagged image. If you are using docker-compose, then this is a relatively simple matter of changing the image line in your docker-compose.yaml file and then stopping (docker-compose down) and restarting (docker-compose up -d) your Reactor daemon. But there's a catch... not all of you can safely just switch from the aarch64 image to the arm64 image. And, you can't just trust the output of uname -m, for example, because this exposes the CPU architecture, but not the word size of the OS running on that CPU. For Raspberry Pi systems, the transition to 64-bit operating systems was long (starting in 2016) and not always obvious — although there was a first "official" 64-bit OS for RPis in 2020, it did not become a default recommendation in the Raspberry Pi Imager until 2021, and then that was only the default for Pi 3/4 systems with >4GB RAM; it was 2022 before it was universally recommended for all 64-bit CPUs regardless of RAM size. Depending on when you first imaged your RPi system and what default you may have been offered/chosen, you could today easily have a 64-bit CPU Raspberry Pi running a 32-bit version of the operating system. Upgrades along the way would not change this; changing it to fully 64-bit requires a full reimage of the system. To establish if your OS is 64- or 32-bit, log in to your Pi and run: sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH. If the response is arm64 or aarch64, then you are running a 64-bit OS and you should use the arm64-tagged image. If it's anything else, you are running a 32-bit OS, and you should use the armv7l-tagged image. pi@rpi4-1:~ $ sudo dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_ARCH armhf pi@rpi4-1:~ $ uname -m aarch64 pi@rpi4-1:~ $ In the example above, the uname command reports that the CPU is 64-bit architecture (aarch64), which is true for the host on which I ran these commands, but the DEB_HOST_ARCH value is armhf, indicating a 32-bit operating system. This system has to use the armv7l-tagged image. Other systems will have their own ways of determining the word size of the running OS. Since the majority of Reactor users running ARM systems are on Raspberry Pis, I am able to supply the above instructions, but if you happen to have a different ARM system, you'll need to do some web searching to figure out how to expose that information. Or, you can just try the arm64 image, and if it doesn't start up, try the armv7l image. Remember to always back up your system before making any changes. For everyone, please make this change as soon as possible, and if you have any trouble finding a working image, please (1) go back to the current aarch64 image; and (2) let me know in this thread along with as much detail about your host system as you can offer (including the output of the dpkg-architecture command mentioned above).
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor

System integration roadmap

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
21 Posts 10 Posters 3.9k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rafale77R Offline
    rafale77R Offline
    rafale77
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    From what I recall he likes Scotch better...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

      These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

      The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

      This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

      So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

      therealdbT Offline
      therealdbT Offline
      therealdb
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      @toggledbits I’m more than happy to do mqtt and ha-bridge, to start. I’ve some open source time to invest (because I love to give back) and I’ll be more than happy to help.

      --
      On a mission to automate everything.

      My MS Reactor contrib
      My Luup Plug-ins

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • PerHP Offline
        PerHP Offline
        PerH
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        I'd like to try a Domoticz integration, but spring usually brings more outdoor projects.. some day!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Offline
          C Offline
          cokeman
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          I'd love to see a docker addon for HA...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by cw-kid
            #13

            I'd like for the Home Remote dashboard app to support the MSR API. So I could add an MSR device object in to the Home Remote Designer and then see all my Global Reactions (Scenes) that are in MSR etc. I could then easily create dashboard "Scene" tiles to run these MSR Global Reactions from my dashboard interface.

            But obviously that would be down to the Home Remote developer to add native support for it.

            I was able to add a "HTTP Switch" in to the Home Remote Designer and send one HTTP command to MSR when the switch was turned ON in the dashboard app and send another HTTP command when the switch was turned OFF etc.

            Using commands like:

            http://MSR-IP:8111/api/v1/reaction/re-klkn8rxw/run
            

            It worked but I can see it being very time consuming creating these types of HTTP switches in the Home Remote dashboard, as its basically a plugin script in Home Remote and not the easiest thing to scale up and just create a load of new switches that can run various MSR Global Reactions.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

              These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

              The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

              This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

              So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              @toggledbits said in System integration roadmap:

              The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.
              This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera

              Please can you explain this in more simple terms for us dummies.

              Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

              All that devices various ServiceID's and variables ?

              Thanks

              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cw-kidC cw-kid

                @toggledbits said in System integration roadmap:

                The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.
                This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera

                Please can you explain this in more simple terms for us dummies.

                Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                All that devices various ServiceID's and variables ?

                Thanks

                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbitsT Offline
                toggledbits
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                @cw-kid said in System integration roadmap:

                Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                Yes. In that respect, same as Reactor for Vera. Not user-friendly, but complete. The system-defined capabilities will still be there, like power_switch and dimming. You will able to use either.

                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kidC Offline
                  cw-kid
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  OK well that's a good thing then. Will make it like PLEG also in that respect, where you can see and choose all ServiceID's and variables.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • LibraSunL Offline
                    LibraSunL Offline
                    LibraSun
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    I'd love to see native Google Calendar integration (in much the same way that GCal 3 plug-in currently offers I/O to a designated Google Calendar).

                    Fun way to track past events and preset future triggers dynamically.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Matteburk
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Reolink Cameras with NVR ... would be lovely to trigger stuff with....

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • LibraSunL Offline
                        LibraSunL Offline
                        LibraSun
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        Heck, if we're heading in that direction, then I toss RING Cameras and Doorbells into the hat. I realize that's a tall order from every perspective.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Do those camera systems not have their own HTTP API ?

                          I have Hikvision cameras and they have a HTTP API for controlling aspects of the cameras. So Vera and MSR or anything else can control them via HTTP requests.

                          Turning on / off motion detection for example or starting a manual recording.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cw-kidC cw-kid

                            Do those camera systems not have their own HTTP API ?

                            I have Hikvision cameras and they have a HTTP API for controlling aspects of the cameras. So Vera and MSR or anything else can control them via HTTP requests.

                            Turning on / off motion detection for example or starting a manual recording.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Matteburk
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            @cw-kid This is what I found
                            https://support.reolink.com/hc/en-us/article_attachments/900001038146/CGI_command.pdf

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT toggledbits locked this topic on
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Recent Topics

                            • Error: Command timeout
                              G
                              gwp1
                              0
                              6
                              91

                            • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              5
                              131
                              74.5k

                            • [Solved] Local expression in Rule does not evaluate as they used to do
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              5
                              179

                            • Home Assistant 2025.11.2 and latest-25315
                              G
                              gwp1
                              0
                              6
                              210

                            • Notice to Docker + ARM Users (RPi 3/4/5 and others)
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              1
                              1
                              71

                            • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                              M
                              mgvra
                              1
                              3
                              168

                            • Script action and custom timers
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              4
                              183

                            • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                              CatmanV2C
                              CatmanV2
                              0
                              12
                              484

                            • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                              akbooerA
                              akbooer
                              1
                              2
                              146

                            • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                              CrilleC
                              Crille
                              0
                              6
                              219

                            • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                              toggledbitsT
                              toggledbits
                              0
                              17
                              616

                            • Shelly Wall Display XL
                              akbooerA
                              akbooer
                              2
                              9
                              904
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                            Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Unsolved