Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. Having issues with a shell command
Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
tunnusT
Using build 25328 and having the following users.yaml configuration: users: # This section defines your valid users. admin: ******* groups: # This section defines your user groups. Optionally, it defines application # and API access restrictions (ACLs) for the group. Users may belong to # more than one group. Again, no required or special groups here. admin_group: users: - admin applications: true # special form allows access to ALL applications guests: users: "*" applications: - dashboard api_acls: # This ACL allows users in the "admin" group to access the API - url: "/api" group: admin_group allow: true log: true # This ACL allows anyone/thing to access the /api/v1/alive API endpoint - url: "/api/v1/alive" allow: true session: timeout: 7200 # (seconds) rolling: true # activity extends timeout when true # If log_acls is true, the selected ACL for every API access is logged. log_acls: true # If debug_acls is true, even more information about ACL selection is logged. debug_acls: true My goal is to allow anonymous user to dashboard, but MSR is still asking for a password when trying to access that. Nothing in the logs related to dashboard access. Probably an error in the configuration, but help needed to find that. Tried to put url: "/dashboard" under api_acls, but that was a long shot and didn't work.
Multi-System Reactor
VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
S
I use Virtual Entity Controller virtual switches which I turn on via webhooks from other applications. Once a switch triggers and turns on, I can then activate associated rules. I would like each virtual switch to automatically turn off after a configurable time (e.g., 5 seconds, 10 seconds). Is there a better way to achieve this auto-off behavior instead of creating a separate rule for each switch that uses the 'Condition must be sustained for' option to turn it off? With a large number of these switches (and the associated turn-off rules), I'm checking to see if there is a simpler approach.If not, could this be a feature request to add an auto-off timer directly to the virtual switches. Thanks Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-26011-c621bbc7 VirtualEntityController v25356 Synology Docker
Multi-System Reactor
Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
toggledbitsT
TL;DR: Format of data in storage directory will soon change. Make sure you are backing up the contents of that directory in its entirety, and you preserve your backups for an extended period, particularly the backup you take right before upgrading to the build containing this change (date of that is still to be determined, but soon). The old data format will remain readable (so you'll be able to read your pre-change backups) for the foreseeable future. In support of a number of other changes in the works, I have found it necessary to change the storage format for Reactor objects in storage at the physical level. Until now, plain, standard JSON has been used to store the data (everything under the storage directory). This has served well, but has a few limitations, including no real support for native JavaScript objects like Date, Map, Set, and others. It also is unable to store data that contains "loops" — objects that reference themselves in some way. I'm not sure exactly when, but in the not-too-distant future I will publish a build using the new data format. It will automatically convert existing JSON data to the new format. For the moment, it will save data in both the new format and the old JSON format, preferring the former when loading data from storage. I have been running my own home with this new format for several months, and have no issues with data loss or corruption. A few other things to know: If you are not already backing up your storage directory, you should be. At a minimum, back this directory up every time you make big changes to your Rules, Reactions, etc. Your existing JSON-format backups will continue to be readable for the long-term (years). The code that loads data from these files looks for the new file format first (which will have a .dval suffix), and if not found, will happily read (and convert) a same-basenamed .json file (i.e. it looks for ruleid.dval first, and if it doesn't find it, it tries to load ruleid.json). I'll publish detailed instructions for restoring from old backups when the build is posted (it's easy). The new .dval files are not directly human-readable or editable as easily as the old .json files. A new utility will be provided in the tools directory to convert .dval data to .json format, which you can then read or edit if you find that necessary. However, that may not work for all future data, as my intent is to make more native JavaScript objects directly storable, and many of those objects cannot be stored in JSON. You may need to modify your backup tools/scripts to pick up the new files: if you explicitly name .json files (rather than just specifying the entire storage directory) in your backup configuration, you will need to add .dval files to get a complete, accurate backup. I don't think this will be an issue for any of you; I imagine that you're all just backing up the entire contents of storage regardless of format/name, that is the safest (and IMO most correct) way to go (if that's not what you're doing, consider changing your approach). The current code stores the data in both the .dval form and the .json form to hedge against any real-world problems I don't encounter in my own use. Some future build will drop this redundancy (i.e. save only to .dval form). However, the read code for the .json form will remain in any case. This applies only to persistent storage that Reactor creates and controls under the storage tree. All other JSON data files (e.g. device data for Controllers) are unaffected by this change and will remain in that form. YAML files are also unaffected by this change. This thread is open for any questions or concerns.
Multi-System Reactor
Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request 2?
CatmanV2C
Just another thought. Adding devices from my Home Assistant / Zigbee2MQTT integration. Works perfectly but they always add as their IEEE address. Some of these devices have up to 10 entities associated, and the moment they are renamed to something sensible, each of those entities 'ceases to exist' in MSR. I like things tidy, and deleting each defunct entity needs 3 clicks. Any chance of a 'bulk delete' option? No biggy as I've pretty much finished my Z-wave migration and I don't expect to be adding more than 2 new Zigbee devices Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Copying a global reaction
tunnusT
With build 25328, if you copy a global reaction, a new reaction does not appear in the UI unless you do a refresh. I recall this used to work without needing this page refresh? Anyway, only a minor nuisance.
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Difficulty defining repeating annual period
R
I have tried numerous ways to define a recurring annual period, for example from December 15 to January 15. No matter which method I try - after and before, between, after and/not after, Reactor reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date. Some constructs also seem to cause Reactor to hang, timeout and restart. For example "before January 15 is evaluated as true, but reports "waiting for invalid date, invalid date". Does anyone have a tried and true method to define a recurring annual period? I think the "between" that I used successfully in the past may have broken with one of the updates.
Multi-System Reactor
Need help with sequence
T
Good evening all, For about the past week or so, I've been having problems with a specific rule in my home automation that controls when my home goes from an Away mode to Home mode. One of the conditions it checked for was my alarm panel, when it changed from Armed Away to Disarmed. There seems to have been a firmware update on the panel that added an intermittent step of "pending", and I can't say for certain it happens 100% of the time. Is there a way to write a condition that so it changes from one condition, to the next, and then another condition? As in, Home alarm changes from armed_away to pending to disarmed. Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
Possible feature request?
CatmanV2C
No idea how easy this would be. During my migration away from Z-wave I've been replacing the Z-wave devices with Sonoff which has broken some of my automations. Any chance of a 'Test Reaction' function to call out which ones are broken because an entity no longer exists? Without actually running the reaction? Or does this exist already and I'm just not aware of how to do it? Obviously I can see entities that are no longer available, but not quite what I'm looking for. I guess it's something of an edge case so no huge issue. TIA! C
Multi-System Reactor
Logic Assistance: Exterior Lights on when Illuminance Below Threshold
PablaP
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Time series documentation
tunnusT
Is the current manual (incl. examples) up to date with how retention value is handled in time series configuration? Referring to this post
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT templates for ZIgbee scene controller, or a better way?
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reset a delay
CatmanV2C
I'm sure this has been asked, and answered, but damned if I can figure it out Use case: I have a rear garden with lights. A door from the kitchen into the garden and a door from the garage. Currently if I open the kitchen door the lights come on (yay) and a 3 minute delay starts. After 3 minutes, no matter what else happens, the lights go off (Boo! But also yay!) What I would like is for the 3 minute delay until the lights go off to start from the latest door open event. That is, if I'm going from kitchen to garage, and back again, the lights stay on until there's three minutes of no activity. I've tried 'hacking' with a virtual switch, but can't seem to stop the delay. Any pointers? TIA C
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Loading Screen Safari
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Constraints states visually do not match actual
S
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Feature request: For Each action on arrays/groups
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor

Having issues with a shell command

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
60 Posts 2 Posters 10.2k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbitsT Offline
    toggledbits
    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
    #21

    That's right.

    Show all the values when you post an error, please.

    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kidC Offline
      cw-kid
      wrote on last edited by cw-kid
      #22

      This is what the summary card looks like after hitting the Reset button and then the red alerts come back each time after I have cleared them

      0cfc663b-572f-4961-a363-181baf968a32-image.png

      Expressions:

      61775336-47d3-41eb-931e-1bb27dcc13ef-image.png

      Not sure why the alerts are appearing ?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbitsT Offline
        toggledbits
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        No errors there.

        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbitsT Offline
          toggledbits
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Have you removed the Set Variable actions?

          Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

          cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT toggledbits

            Have you removed the Set Variable actions?

            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by cw-kid
            #25

            @toggledbits said in Having issues with a shell command:

            Have you removed the Set Variable actions?

            Yes

            75223aa3-b21a-455c-974c-afc19b2dd1bb-image.png

            The bell icon goes red when the rule is Reset.

            43797874-db01-42e5-a42c-4fefe063aa12-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbitsT Offline
              toggledbits
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Removing the actions is/was correct. I'll give this a try later today and see

              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                #27

                Using a Vera Multistring plugin device.

                487aad09-2d64-425a-87ee-946664f05766-image.png

                I added these in the rules Reaction to send the values to the generic sensor device in Vera etc.

                5a6f742d-3ffb-4b31-990e-d492053fe2e2-image.png

                Just need to translate codes 200 and 620 to "On" and "Off" instead.

                I could maybe delete these two expressions from the rule also.

                af1ba5df-0ba4-4aa5-b595-270f77c12338-image.png

                EDIT:

                I've just seen a new field called "status" maybe I can use that instead.

                On = "OK"

                Off = "Standby"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                  #28

                  I had a moment to do a quick test. Duh; I'm forgetting my own code's behavior. This is actually pretty simple. When you reset the rule, all state and expression/variable values are removed, so effectively, everything is null. When the rule is then re-evaluated, expressions are evaluated first, and since ps4wakercheck is null at that point because the action has not yet run, then ps4wakerparse is also null, so the last two expressions can't dereference through null and throw an evaluation error. This is actually all expected, correct behavior.

                  You can probably just clear these two spurious errors (caused by the reset/no data condition at rule "boot"), as they will not happen again, typically. The only other way you would see this is if the command actually fails hard in some way and produces no parseable JSON output. Then you'll get alerts again, but that's probably good because you might want to know that.

                  Another way to handle it is to simply modify the last two expressions like this:

                  • ps4powerstatus = ps4wakerparse?.statusCode
                  • ps4runningapp = ps4wakerparse?["running-app-name"]

                  The ?. and ?[ operators, described in the docs, are special coalescing versions of the standard . and [ operators that guard null on their left-hand operands. If the left-side operand value is null, the coalescing operator will simply return null and no error will be issued. I think this also makes sense in this application. These coalescing operators are provided for exactly this kind of case, so this is a perfect example of their use, and you should familiarize yourself with them (and apply them often).

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbitsT Offline
                    toggledbits
                    wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                    #29

                    You can map a value from one to another using a simple map object, like this:

                    mappedStatus = ( { '200': 'On', '620': 'Off' } )?[ ps4wakerparse.statusCode ] ?? "unknown"

                    Here, we create an object on the fly (the ( { ... } ) part), dereference through it using the ?[ coalesce operator, which will return null if the value of statusCode doesn't match anything in the object, and then use a final ?? coalesce operator to change an unmapped/null to the word unknown

                    Ref: Reactor docs: Expressions

                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                    cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      I had a moment to do a quick test. Duh; I'm forgetting my own code's behavior. This is actually pretty simple. When you reset the rule, all state and expression/variable values are removed, so effectively, everything is null. When the rule is then re-evaluated, expressions are evaluated first, and since ps4wakercheck is null at that point because the action has not yet run, then ps4wakerparse is also null, so the last two expressions can't dereference through null and throw an evaluation error. This is actually all expected, correct behavior.

                      You can probably just clear these two spurious errors (caused by the reset/no data condition at rule "boot"), as they will not happen again, typically. The only other way you would see this is if the command actually fails hard in some way and produces no parseable JSON output. Then you'll get alerts again, but that's probably good because you might want to know that.

                      Another way to handle it is to simply modify the last two expressions like this:

                      • ps4powerstatus = ps4wakerparse?.statusCode
                      • ps4runningapp = ps4wakerparse?["running-app-name"]

                      The ?. and ?[ operators, described in the docs, are special coalescing versions of the standard . and [ operators that guard null on their left-hand operands. If the left-side operand value is null, the coalescing operator will simply return null and no error will be issued. I think this also makes sense in this application. These coalescing operators are provided for exactly this kind of case, so this is a perfect example of their use, and you should familiarize yourself with them (and apply them often).

                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kid
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      @toggledbits said in Having issues with a shell command:

                      The ?. and ?[ operators

                      That fixes it the red alerts don't appear any more when Resetting the rule.

                      Thanks

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kid
                        wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                        #31

                        @toggledbits

                        Finished device in Vera:

                        9f0f908b-7d3b-48fd-b4de-a6763a119b6d-image.png

                        Home Remote dashboard tile:

                        5d493700-7f02-4556-a7d5-25a69adc97d6-image.png

                        Had to just add an additional ? to this code to stop the red alert appearing again.

                        ( { '200': 'On', '620': 'Off' } )?[ ps4wakerparse?.statusCode ] ?? "unknown"
                        

                        And now the alert doesn't come back again when resetting the rule.

                        So I think everything is all working fine now, at least while the PS4 is turned ON.

                        Thanks

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                          You can map a value from one to another using a simple map object, like this:

                          mappedStatus = ( { '200': 'On', '620': 'Off' } )?[ ps4wakerparse.statusCode ] ?? "unknown"

                          Here, we create an object on the fly (the ( { ... } ) part), dereference through it using the ?[ coalesce operator, which will return null if the value of statusCode doesn't match anything in the object, and then use a final ?? coalesce operator to change an unmapped/null to the word unknown

                          Ref: Reactor docs: Expressions

                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kidC Offline
                          cw-kid
                          wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                          #32

                          @toggledbits

                          So everything last night was working OK when the PS4 was turned ON.

                          I am now testing when the PS4 is OFF.

                          Some issues the shell command doesn't seem to be populating the ps4wakercheck variable for some reason and its null.

                          d29a05c8-0fa2-4a65-a328-bc411db24909-image.png

                          a01bf623-ae8e-45e3-b986-1814722a20c4-image.png

                          Vera device when PS4 is OFF

                          b2b3e1e4-40de-48cf-8969-a2a9a4862834-image.png

                          If I run the "ps4-waker check" command in terminal it outputs correctly as expected.

                          root@HP-Thin01:/home/stuart# ps4-waker check
                          {
                            "type": "device",
                            "statusLine": "620 Server Standby",
                            "statusCode": "620",
                            "status": "Standby",
                            "host-id": "C863F1400EF1",
                            "host-type": "PS4",
                            "host-name": "PS4-806",
                            "host-request-port": "997",
                            "device-discovery-protocol-version": "00020020",
                            "system-version": "08520011",
                            "address": "192.168.0.201"
                          }
                          

                          Log file:

                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.077Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction PS4 Waker Check<SET> (rule-krq612qx:S)
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.077Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1378> Engine#1 reaction rule-krq612qx:S step 1 shell command { "command": "ps4-waker check", "rule": "rule-krq612qx", "rvar": "ps4wakercheck", "ignore_exit": true }
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.094Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1105> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status 3; task 19
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.098Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1140> _process_reaction_queue ending with 1 in queue; none delayed/ready; waiting
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.617Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction PS4 Waker Check<SET> step 1 error executing shell `ps4-waker check': Error: Command failed: ps4-waker check
                          
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.620Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:674> Rule#rule-krq612qx rule set variable ps4wakercheck = (object) (null)
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.621Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:940> Engine#1 set variable rule rule-krq612qx ps4wakercheck=(null), requesting re-eval
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.624Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:962> Rule#rule-krq612qx (PS4 Waker Check) evaluate() acquiring mutex
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.625Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1140> _process_reaction_queue() wake-up!
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.625Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:966> Rule#rule-krq612qx._evaluate() mutex acquired, evaluating
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.626Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:970> Rule#rule-krq612qx update rate is 2/min limit 60/min
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.627Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:892> Rule#rule-krq612qx evaluateExpressions() with 3 expressions
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.628Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:982> Rule#rule-krq612qx._evaluate() trigger state now false (was false)
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.629Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:984> Rule#rule-krq612qx._evaluate() constraints state true
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.629Z <Rule:5:Rule.js:993> Rule#rule-krq612qx rule state now false, changed no
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.631Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1101> _process_reaction_queue() running task 19 { "tid": 19, "id": "rule-krq612qx:S", "rule": "rule-krq612qx", "__reaction": [RuleReaction#rule-krq612qx:S], "next_step": 2, "status": 1, "ts": 1627901487069, "parent": --null--, "__resolve": --function--, "__reject": --function--, "__promise": [object Promise], "attempts": 1 }
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.632Z <Engine:NOTICE> Resuming reaction PS4 Waker Check<SET> (rule-krq612qx:S) from step 2
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.632Z <Engine:NOTICE> PS4 Waker Check<SET> delaying until 1627901492632<02/08/2021, 11:51:32>
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.633Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1105> _process_reaction_queue() task returned, new status 2; task 19
                          2021-08-02T10:51:27.636Z <Engine:5:Engine.js:1140> _process_reaction_queue() ending with 1 in queue; waiting for 1 (next delayed task)
                          

                          If I turn ON the PS4 it starts working again and the variable is populated with data via the shell command.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by toggledbits
                            #33

                            Make sure you restarted Reactor after installing the update. The ignore flag is in the action data (so the UI has done the right thing), but the log file content looks like an older version of the Engine running.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbitsT Offline
                              toggledbits
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              Any update on this?

                              Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                              cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                Any update on this?

                                cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kidC Offline
                                cw-kid
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                @toggledbits

                                Sorry for the delay.

                                Yes its working now after restarting MSR.

                                So when the PS4 is OFF its now reporting the status correctly from the ps4-waker check variables.

                                So its working when its on and off now.

                                However I am still getting some alert errors sometimes occasionally.

                                This seems to happen if the shell command doesn't return any response on the first go, but maybe on the second attempt it works and then populates the variables OK.

                                When this happens these alerts remain in the MSR gui etc.

                                5e822efb-4804-4267-91c0-f364d9d3c4b1-image.png

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbitsT Offline
                                  toggledbits
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  Use your coalesce operators on those expressions to suppress the reference errors and just yield a null result.

                                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                  cw-kidC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                    Use your coalesce operators on those expressions to suppress the reference errors and just yield a null result.

                                    cw-kidC Offline
                                    cw-kidC Offline
                                    cw-kid
                                    wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                    #37

                                    @toggledbits

                                    The actions in the Reaction that send the data to the Vera MutliString device, didn't have "?" in their expressions.

                                    I have just added them like this:

                                    af2110ec-866f-49ea-b68a-ad78217f406b-image.png fe8507c9-65d5-47cf-985e-b1c2ac880567-image.png

                                    EDIT:

                                    It doesn't like the first one " mappedstatuscode? " I've removed the question mark for that one.

                                    fc66e114-b3c6-4dda-9da6-8da356b826dc-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • cw-kidC Offline
                                      cw-kidC Offline
                                      cw-kid
                                      wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                      #38

                                      I've also now added a virtual switch in Vera, this works with two new MSR rules (#3 and #4).

                                      First rule (#4), that when the virtual switch it turned on or off manually in Vera / Home Remote app, it will send the appropriate power command to the ps4 via shell command:

                                      ON = ps4-waker

                                      OFF = ps4-waker standby

                                      The second rule (#3) updates the state of the Vera virtual switch, if the PS4's power is controlled by some other outside means.
                                      This rule monitors the "mappedstatuscode" expression variable, which will either say "On" or "Off" and then it adjusts the Vera virtual switch accordingly to match that current actual state of the PS4, so the virtual switch doesn't get out of sync.

                                      I am still experimenting with this, but my thinking was to have an additional "switch" in Vera / Home Remote app, to be able to manually / directly control the PS4's power (outside of a Harmony activity) as a backup switch. Say if the PS4 didn't turn on when the Harmony Activity for it was started and the other MSR rule (#1) didn't work with its attempt and didn't turn on the PS4.

                                      Although having said that, I guess some kind of test and retry (in rule #1) to attempt to turn on the PS4 power again, might be a better way of doing it, if it failed to do so initially.

                                      So in total I currently have four rules.

                                      1. "Lounge - Harmony PS4 Activity Start - Wake PS4 Shell Command"

                                      Turns on PS4 when Harmony Activity is starting.

                                      628b1cb3-f4d5-4f42-b8c3-874d7628d864-image.png

                                      1. "PS4 Waker Check"

                                      This is the rule with all the expressions in it for the MultiString Vera device. Displays the PS4's current status etc

                                      994a2943-02b4-4fb4-b62e-643dcae82d13-image.png

                                      1. "Playstation 4 Virtual Switch Status from PS4-Waker"

                                      Controls the virtual switch in Vera based on the actual state of the PS4 power, info as coming from ps4-waker check and rule #2

                                      83635ed0-28ed-41cb-83d3-878ebc2ff022-image.png

                                      1. "Playstation 4 Virtual Switch ON / OFF"

                                      Sends either the on or off shell commands to the PS4 based on the virtual switch in Vera / Home Remote app being manually operated.

                                      9cdccbd5-1f55-4ad3-b0b2-4782061b969c-image.png

                                      Home Remote tiles:

                                      299c3e5c-b68c-4a87-b567-9328d6305574-image.png

                                      I am sure there must be better / easier ways of doing all this.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        This seems to happen if the shell command doesn't return any response on the first go

                                        Have you figured out what ps4-waker does when it doesn't get the device turned on? Does it return a particular exit code that isn't used by the on/off status result? Or does it just give an empty reply? Either way, you might write a wrapper script to detect that and retry (Reactor would then start the wrapper script instead of ps4-waker directly.

                                        Issues like this are how you bring your shell scripting and system administration skills up a notch.

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        cw-kidC 2 Replies Last reply
                                        1
                                        • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                                          This seems to happen if the shell command doesn't return any response on the first go

                                          Have you figured out what ps4-waker does when it doesn't get the device turned on? Does it return a particular exit code that isn't used by the on/off status result? Or does it just give an empty reply? Either way, you might write a wrapper script to detect that and retry (Reactor would then start the wrapper script instead of ps4-waker directly.

                                          Issues like this are how you bring your shell scripting and system administration skills up a notch.

                                          cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kid
                                          wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                                          #40

                                          @toggledbits said in Having issues with a shell command:

                                          Have you figured out what ps4-waker does when it doesn't get the device turned on?

                                          I'm not sure, I will look out for when it happens again.

                                          I think it makes MSR error when it tries to send the "ps4-waker" command to turn ON the games console but fails to connect for whatever reason.

                                          Most times it works and the console does turn on but sometimes it doesn't.

                                          Thanks

                                          toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Access control - allowing anonymous user to dashboard
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            33

                                          • VEC Virtual Switch Auto Off
                                            S
                                            SweetGenius
                                            1
                                            1
                                            28

                                          • Upcoming Storage Change -- Got Back-ups?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            2
                                            1
                                            26

                                          • Oddness in Copy/Move of Reactions
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            1
                                            57

                                          • [Solved] function isRuleEnabled() issue
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            4
                                            78

                                          • [Reactor] Problem with Global Reactions and groups
                                            therealdbT
                                            therealdb
                                            0
                                            3
                                            97

                                          • Possible feature request 2?
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            74

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            133
                                            80.0k

                                          • Genuinely impressed with Zigbee and HA / Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            1
                                            9
                                            381

                                          • Copying a global reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            3
                                            116

                                          • [HowTo] Using HABridge with Reactor
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            9
                                            449

                                          • [Reactor] Bug when sending MQTT boolean payloads
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            167
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved