Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
3

3rdStng

@3rdStng
Missing attribute after upgrade
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Build 26284 stuck at Loading Reactor UI
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
MSR with reverse proxy
tunnusT
I'm trying to use MSR via reserve proxy in Synology DSM, but MSR page does not load https://<public ip>:30000/reactor/en-US/ At the same time logging page loads normally https://<public ip>:30000/api/v1/log I thought maybe authentication was messing it up, but there was no deny entries in the log, and also disabling authentication did not make any difference. For this use case VPN is not an option (that works, but as said not an option for this particular use case). Any ideas what could cause this? MSR build latest-26242-28d69aa8, Chrome browser
Multi-System Reactor
Use of Google Gemini as an MSR and Hubitat configuration aid
R
I may be late to the AI party on this, but I recently ran into difficulty installing and configuring the Nexia Thermostat Manager on my Hubitat C8 Pro. Hoping for some immediate help I performed a Google search on my problem. I was a bit surprised to see Gemini jump into assist. Gemini walked me through the steps to clean up the failed install, followed by a script for successful installation and configuration. I would not have expected Gemini to "know" this much about Hubitat. Next I sought assistance MSR with the Entity Actions needed to set up the desired controls. I was unclear which of the attribute fields I should to set the cooling an heating temperatures. Once again, Gemini came back not with just a link to a possible explanation, but an easy to follow explanation instead. Once again, I did not expect Gemini to provide such detailed assistance with MSR. Gemini will be a key tool in my HA toolkit in the future.
How-To
[MSR] Native fan capabilty
therealdbT
Nothing more to add. I see we have hvac_blower, but, anyway, maybe a native fan on the same assumptions of the fan from HASS could be reasonable. I have a couple of them. ie, this is from ESPHome via HASS. x_hass.domain="fan" x_hass.entity_id="fan.kitchen_seashell_hood_ventilation_fan" x_hass.floor_id=null x_hass.services=["fan","esphome"] x_hass.source="esphome" x_hass.state="off" x_hass_attr.friendly_name="Seashell Hood Ventilation Fan" x_hass_attr.percentage=50 x_hass_attr.percentage_step=25 x_hass_attr.preset_mode="" x_hass_attr.preset_modes=[] x_hass_attr.supported_features=49 Thanks.
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Rule do not fire
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Rule condition shows TRUE in UI but Rule never transitions to SET — survives full restart
N
Build: latest-26221-b25bb3e3, Docker on Synology. Hi, I have a Rule whose Trigger/Constraints reference other Rules via Rule State ... is TRUE. At some point it stops firing. Expanding the rule's condition tree in the UI shows every Trigger and Constraint condition green/TRUE — confirmed live by walking into the room and watching Motion go true in real time. Rule History shows no new SET, just old reset entries. Tried, on the same rule, same evening: recreating the trigger conditions with fresh IDs, recreating the constraint conditions with fresh IDs (flat and wrapped in a new Group — wrapping in a Group produced one SET, but it didn't reproduce on repeat attempts with the same structure), and finally a full container restart with a verified-correct saved rule. Still no SET, even with a fresh live motion event right after the restart. Separately, I found that this rule (and its 10 per-room clones) share identical internal condition/group IDs with each other — leftover from a batch clone done months ago, never regenerated. Not sure if that's related, since fixing the IDs didn't reliably fix the symptom either. Has anyone seen a Rule State condition show TRUE in the UI without the Rule ever producing a SET, surviving a clean restart? Thanks in advance
Multi-System Reactor
DynamicGroupController and attributes
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits I'm back to trying to optimize a couple of things based on dynamic group. First of all, I think I found a typo in the doc: primary_attribute: "binary_sensor.state" primary_attribute_value: | d = false; each id in members: d = getEntity(id)?.attributes?.power_switch?.state or d, d I think the correct code snippet is d = false, All that said, my use case for dynamic groups is to group 3 different climate devices, so I could easily command them at the same time. Commands are good, but sometimes I want to check if any of the devices are on, and that's easily done with a similar snippet as the one you have in the docs. But this is limited to the primary attribute, while I want to have any of the attributes in the group to be driven by a similar logic (while all are null in the group). ie, access hvac_control.mode and see if any of the unit is set to cool, or heat. Is that possible, without re-defining an expression in each of my rules? Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
Unofficial thread for compatibility
tunnusT
As there are statements about compatibility for home assistant versions in MSR new version announcements (e.g. "HassController: Bless Hass to 2025.7.3"), I thought it would be good idea to track other controllers as well. As an example, I can confirm that build "latest-25208-c53e8513" works with Hubitat Elevation C-8 platform version 2.4.2.134 using Maker API. Updates: (the latest versions first in the list) OK: build "latest-25264-2fbe9217" with Hubitat C-8 platform v. 2.4.3.123
Multi-System Reactor
Ooops - Deleted Reactor Ex Machina II
R
I accidentally deleted Reactor Ex Machina II (REM II) from my Reactor rules. I tried to recover it by deleting the .json and .dval in the Rules subdirectory and then recreating it from Togglebits original posting, but that did not work. Does anyone know how to recover REM ll ?
Multi-System Reactor
Bail out of failed reaction?
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Arming Envisalink panel from MSR
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] DynamicGroupController updating members issue
CrilleC
Edit: Solved in latest-26221. Bare-metal latest-26193 I have this group: "OKforLarm": name: OK för Larm select: - include_controller: vera - include_capability: door_sensor filter_expression: entity.attributes.door_sensor.state It contains the entities I expect but behaves a bit odd. When I open vera>device_10097 the entity attribute door_sensor.state changes to true but it won't show up as member in the group, when I also open vera>device_10095 they both shows as members and when I close vera>device_10095 it disappear from the group but when I close vera>device_10097 it lingers in the group until I restart Reactor.
Multi-System Reactor
Upgrade Issues
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Conflicting Set Reaction Groups Appear to Fire Simultaneously in Single Rule Evaluation
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[SOLVED] Question regarding "in" vs "contains" vs contents of the string
G
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
openLuup console disappeared - 500 - Internal Server Error
A
Love openLuup - it just keeps working perfectly. I started looking at trying to add a gen4 Shelly device to the Shelly plugin via L_ShellyBridge.lua. The plugin is a little uncooked (no rudeness intended), so a bit of a rabbit hole for me. All of a sudden no console pages available in either Firefox or Chrome. AltUI works perfectly and all the log files indicate no errors. openLuup still running everything works as it should - just no console pages. I possibly screwed something up but any recently changes files show no problems. The original/ backup of L_ShellyBridge.lua was reinstated but still no console. Bit stumped on this one. Not sure how to debug. Any ideas?
Plugins
Logon screen timeout
G
Noticing since 170 that the lock screen doesn't switch to the logon prompt but, rather, stays on the active UI until such time as you go to click something within it. Then it jumps to the login screen. Brave browser Brave 1.92.139 (Official Build) (arm64) Chromium: 150.0.7871.114
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] Copy&past of actions and/or drag&drop between set/reset
therealdbT
Hey @toggledbits One thing that bothers me while doing work on new systems/new features, is that I cannot copy&paste actions, and I cannot drag&drop between set and resets. #1 is for when I want to copy an action between different rules opened in two separate browser windows, while #2 is when I just need to flip a bunch of actions in the reset, or move some logic back and forth. Both will be appreciated, but I understand the technical challenges. Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
About
Posts
118
Topics
29
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
1

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Missing attribute after upgrade
    3 3rdStng

    I've noticed this issue over a few various upgrades and it doesn't always happen with every upgrade too. I haven't been able to track down why or anything that may be the cause.

    I am running MSR (latest-26284-5f780cf0) in a docker on unRAID. After an upgrade and my docker restarts, some entity attributes are missing, causing the rule (or reaction) to fail when run. A quick restart of the container resolves everything and the attribute is back.

    I failed to get a screenshot of the attribute list showing the (missing?) at the right of the attrib list, or within the Entities section. I did capture my overview page showing the error from the reaction running. And below that is a small list of the attribs (after the container restart.)

    Is there maybe a race condition during the initial restart and reload of the attribs after an upgrade? If there is more I can supply now, please let me know. Otherwise let me know what to collect next time I see this.

    This round, the issue was with a local app on my HE for my Spa. In the past, it usually is always with an Echo device. Once or twice, the issue was with one of my Hue lights. All of which are 3rd party apps on my HE.

    020b9ef8-ccc5-4185-b222-764ae014fc69-2026-10-12_153524.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
    3 3rdStng

    Thank you @toggledbits. The latest-26177-3f86f4af build resolved the issue.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
    3 3rdStng

    I upgraded the docker to version latest-26177-be756a68. Unfortunately I am still not getting my Telegram alerts unless I put the Chat ID in the GUI. I don't know if it matters, but my chat_id starts with a "-". I think I have another chat ID that does not start/show as a negative ID. I can't test with that ID though.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Answered] OK to remove old json files?
    3 3rdStng

    In looking at my reactor log file for the Telegram issue I recently posted about, I noticed I have over 40 "hass_services-YYYY-MM-DD.json" files lingering in my /reactor/logs/ directory. These go back all the way to Sept 2025. Can these be manually deleted? Or should these be removed as part of the MSR update process? I have a feeling this is how MSR "validates" the approved hass release and that the very latest file should remain. But I wanted to check before I just blew them away.

    8e198324-b107-4e6d-af24-f02b1e537556-image.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] Telegram notification broke with latest update
    3 3rdStng

    Running MSR "latest-26174-bd90c17c" via a docker within unRAID. With this latest docker update a day or two ago, Telegram stopped working. In looking at the logs, the ultimate error is that the chat_id is missing. I verified that my chat ID is still noted within the notifications YAML, but the reactor log still shows it failing. If I manually paste the chat ID into the notification field in the GUI, MSR will send the telegram message. It appears to be ignoring the "If left blank, the profile's default_chat_id value will be used."

    Error log

    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.814Z <Engine:INFO> Enqueueing "rule-2ajie2fd<SET>" (rule-2ajie2fd:S)
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.815Z <Engine:NOTICE> Starting reaction rule-2ajie2fd<SET> (rule-2ajie2fd:S)
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.815Z <Engine:INFO> rule-2ajie2fd<SET> all actions completed.
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:ERR> NotifyTelegram failure response from endpoint: 400 Bad Request
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:INFO> NotifyTelegram request URL: https://api.telegram.org/bot[[REDACTED]]:[[REDACTED]]/sendMessage
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:INFO> NotifyTelegram request body: {"text":"Test message","chat_id":""}
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:INFO> NotifyTelegram request headers: { "content-type": "application/json", "content-length": (undefined) }
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:ERR> NotifyTelegram request to https://api.telegram.org/bot[[REDACTED]]:[[REDACTED]]/sendMessage message Test message
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:CRIT> Error: NotifyTelegram request failed [-]
    Error: NotifyTelegram request failed
        at NotifyTelegram.notify (/opt/reactor/server/lib/NotifyTelegram.js:300:23)
        at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:104:5)
        at async NotifyTelegram.sendNotification (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Notifier.js:189:137)
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-2ajie2fd:S step 1 notification (Telegram) failed: [Error] NotifyTelegram request failed [-]
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <Engine:CRIT> Error: NotifyTelegram request failed [-]
    Error: NotifyTelegram request failed
        at NotifyTelegram.notify (/opt/reactor/server/lib/NotifyTelegram.js:300:23)
        at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:104:5)
        at async NotifyTelegram.sendNotification (/opt/reactor/server/lib/Notifier.js:189:137)
    [latest-26174]2026-06-26T18:04:45.983Z <NotifyTelegram:ERR> NotifyTelegram failure response text: {"ok":false,"error_code":400,"description":"Bad Request: chat_id is empty"}
    

    Snippet of the notification yaml with all the description text removed:

      # Telegram
      Telegram:
        profiles:
          default:
            description: Default Profile
            api_url: https://api.telegram.org
            bot_token: "[[REDACTED]]:[[REDACTED]]"
            default_chat_id: "[[REDACTED]]"
    

    529e0b3a-16a5-461b-9cd0-1971b8706666-image.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
    3 3rdStng

    Docker image "latest-25264-2fbe9217" running on unRAID.
    Running this in Chrome Version 140.0.7339.[128 or 208] with the same results in Edge.

    The UI, when searching within the Rule Set, does not reset/self clear when you click outside of the rule set area.

    To reproduce the issue:
    Click on Rule Sets and type in something within the Search window that does not exist for a rule name. "french" in my example.
    12295a06-0fc3-444d-94c9-9522b26dad42-image.png 397bdea2-670c-4600-8c09-03c169b8b5d9-image.png

    Click outside of the gray area, where my mouse is in the screen grabs, which will close the Rule Sets pop over.
    Click on Rule Sets again and none of the rules will appear. The search term isn't sticky either.
    e0a29f89-abcd-4afa-9bfa-56e5e1871f04-image.png

    The rules won't appear again until you type any character, or press the backspace, in the "Search for rule" field.
    10ddb064-86e1-446c-a69b-a8297f6d90f1-image.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
    3 3rdStng

    I don't know if my issue is related or not here. It seems like it should, but I also understand that local expression handling has changed within the last couple of builds. I don't know exactly when my issue started, nor what build I was on. My guess would be Sept 7th as my rule was last "SET" on that date.

    I am running latest-25254-f6a45e41 in a docker on unRAID. The following rule has been in place for years and has been working pretty reliably, until recently.

    image.png

    The Set Reaction is just to turn on the shower exhaust fan. I collapsed it for screenshot space.
    If I change the Local Expressions to: (and in this order)

    MBath_HumityRise = "CurrentHumidity - MBath_prevHumidity"
    MBath_prevHumidity = "CurrentHumidity"
    CurrentHumidity = (some # value like 48)
    

    And then manually change the CurrentHumidity value to 54 (something >=3), the rule triggers. The MBath_HumidityRise value changes to 6 too. Setting the CurrentHumidity to 50, changes the HumidityRise value to -4.

    When I set these expressions back to pull from the device, I see the prevHumidity value change, but the HumidityRise value always stays 0. I set up global expression under different names and watched the values too. In the same order with the Rise expression above the Prev expression, I never see the Rise value change.

    I will see if I have 25260 available for my docker update and test that, but for the life of me I cannot figure out why this rule stopped working.

    EDIT: Updated to 25260 and I'm still not seeing the HumidityRise expression change. I kept my global expressions since they update and refresh on the page, where the local expressons don't appear to do so within the rule. Watching these two expressions, as soon as the prevHumidity sensor updates, the expression turns green. But the Rise expression didn't and still showed 0. In this screen grab, the humidity went from 46 to 45. I would have expected the top expression to show a -1.

    d9db6c59-4592-4acb-8baf-87dc8ae1a5dd-image.png daaa5ce6-8bd1-440c-af88-b3870297a781-image.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction [Solved with Work Around]
    3 3rdStng

    Refined my actions to include a timeout, just in case someone comes home, but they leave without entering the door.

    Actions:
    Set variable 'lastLockEvent' to "pending entry"
    Turn on porch light
    Turn on driveway lights
    Repeat While:
    -- Triggers:
    -- [lastLockEvent] contains "manually locked"
    -- [OR]
    -- [lastLockEvent] contains "pending entry" (condition sustained for 20 minutes)
    -- Actions:
    -- Delay 10 seconds
    Delay random between 1 to 5 minutes
    Turn off porch light
    Turn off driveway lights

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction [Solved with Work Around]
    3 3rdStng

    @toggledbits said in Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction:

    hub variable should appear as an entity with the string_sensor capability, and it should have an extended action (x_hubitat_Variable.setVariable) to let you change the value.

    Worked perfectly!

    Thank you for the feedback and allowing me to type out my thoughts to refine this rule.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction [Solved with Work Around]
    3 3rdStng

    @toggledbits said in Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction:

    As you disclose details, it's beginning to look like you've imagined a solution based on some other product, and you're trying to get Reactor to work its way, instead of doing it "the Reactor way."

    That is very possible. I'm still mentally mapping this out too. And I 100% know that an image of my rule set would really help clear things up. I'm not in a position to get a screenshot at the moment. I'll try to put my thoughts in to text. (scary)

    Rule set as of today:
    Triggers:
    After midnight AND
    Before sunrise AND
    Any Presence Sensor in the group changes from Not Present to Present

    Actions:
    Turn on the porch light
    Turn on the driveway lights
    Wait for a random period of time between 10-15 minutes
    Turn off the porch light
    Turn off the driveway lights

    What I am after is within the Actions only. The Triggers are still the same.

    Actions:
    Turn on the porch light
    Turn on the driveway lights
    Wait until the HE Hub variable "lastDoorLockEvent" reports "Manually locked"
    Wait for a random period of time between 10-15 minutes
    Turn off the porch light
    Turn off the driveway lights

    The waiting until the hub variable is what's potentially causing the issue. When I go to bed, and assuming the door was open, I'll close it and lock it. So the hub variable now reports "Manually locked". If someone arrives after midnight and before sunrise, the variable will still report "Manually locked" since the lock status hasn't changed yet. So theoretically MSR won't wait since it already sees the variable as what it is looking for.

    And as I type this out, I suppose I could insert a set variable into the actions. I honestly haven't looked yet, but can MSR set a variable that is local to the hub only? Not within MSR.

    Actions:
    Turn on the porch light
    Turn on the driveway lights
    Set HE Hub variable "lastDoorLockEvent" to "waiting entry"
    Repeat Until the HE Hub variable "lastDoorLockEvent" reports "Manually locked"
    Wait for a random period of time between 10-15 minutes
    Turn off the porch light
    Turn off the driveway lights

    The entire concept stems from Hubitat's Rule Machine's "Wait for event" that you can define in a rule. I have a couple of these at my remote HE, where I can't run MSR easily.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction [Solved with Work Around]
    3 3rdStng

    Hmm.... Thanks for this, I think I can make it work, but it may take two Repeat While actions. It doesn't appear that I can wait for a change. It's only waiting for a True or False and not a change from Opened to Closed.

    I believe in my rule I would need a "Repeat While the door is false" (open) to wait for someone to actually open the door. Then a "Repeat While the door is true" (closed) to wait for them to close the door and then continuing on the actions to turn off the lights.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Feature Request - Wait for an event/trigger within Reaction [Solved with Work Around]
    3 3rdStng

    I think this feature request could be accomplished with the use of two or more rules, but it would be great if there was a way to wait for an event or trigger to occur before continuing on in the reactions.

    For example, I have a rule that will turn on some exterior lights if you arrive home after the porch lights have been turned off. Right now this rule randomly will turn off between 5-10 minutes after the person has entered the geofence. On some occasions this 5-10 minutes isn't long enough, say if you are unloading the car or something. I would like to kick off the reaction, but pause it part way through and wait for the door to close and lock, then continue it on. Hubitat Rule Machine has a "Wait for event" option, but I really want to keep all my logic within MSR.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Free to a new home
    3 3rdStng

    I have an older Vera Plus controller that has been collecting dust for a little while. I know the hardware is no longer supported but I would prefer it to go to a good home vs the eWaste center. No charge, just pay for shipping and it's yours. If you are interested, let me know.

    Vera

  • [RESOLVED] Troubleshooting assistance/ideas needed
    3 3rdStng

    I love it when solutions come to you in your dreams. It dawned on me that my Hub Security on the hub was reset but I still had it enabled on MSR. As soon as I enabled it on my hub and restarted MSR, and literally had a kid walk through the entire house, every motion sensor was tripping back and forth from inactive to active back to inactive.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] Troubleshooting assistance/ideas needed
    3 3rdStng

    Running MSR latest-23344-ca53d088 within a Docker.

    My Hubitat (HE) hub suffered almost a 4 day outage from a corrupt backup that failed to restore. During this time I had my MSR docker stopped. Well, I didn't stop it until the the hub had been down for 24 hours. Anyway, I finally got the hub back online this morning and am fixing my MSR rules for everything that was lost. Support needed to purge out the Apps section of the backup.

    So my issue. So far everything I have fixed is working as expected, with the exception of my motion controllers. I can see them go "Active" within my HE, but the Entity within MSR never changes from false to true. I ran through a slew of rooms that have motion sensors and only 1 out of 6 changed to true.

    I removed the sensor I'm testing with from Maker API, restarted MSR, re-added it, restarted MSR, but no difference. I then Deleted it from MSR and restarted MSR. It was re-added, but again no change. How can I go about testing this further to find out why/what is going on?

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] PSA for Hubitat 2.3.7.x upgrade
    3 3rdStng

    Hmm.. OK. I was re-reading the HubitatController section of the docs and realized that I removed my Hub Information device a couple of months back. Perhaps that was part of the issue? I put it back and then upgraded to 2.3.7.140. So far so good. Hopefully it was the missing Hub Information device, or perhaps my HE was just having an off day? I'll monitor things and report back if there is any issues. Thanks all.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] PSA for Hubitat 2.3.7.x upgrade
    3 3rdStng

    Same here. Docker image latest-23344-ca53d088. And I am aware that he would need more details. I'm not reporting this has a bug since he hasn't blessed 2.3.7 yet. I actually upgraded earlier in the day and some rules were triggering just fine. It wasn't until the evening when a lot of my logic was SUPER slow, delayed, or not working at all. Which would make sense if MSR couldn't chat with the hub.
    I don't subscribe to the remote backups, so I don't think that bug will effect me. But good to know, thanks.

    Multi-System Reactor

  • [RESOLVED] PSA for Hubitat 2.3.7.x upgrade
    3 3rdStng

    If you are thinking about upgrading your Hubitat Elevation hub from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7, and you are using MSR.... wait! I was trying to resolve a different issue with the HE and didn't even think twice about how MSR would react. Well... MSR was not happy and was complaining that the events feed had become unresponsive. And my automations were not working either. I have since reverted back to 2.3.6 and will happily wait for @toggledbits to do his magic.

    5a147634-6008-4d4c-a698-c22f6936ee0c-image.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Possible Typo/Correction in Manual
    3 3rdStng

    Hi @toggledbits,

    I had an idea about my Echo speaking which windows or doors are open when an announcement is made reminding the family to close things up when it is hotter outside. Let me start off by saying I'm not great with expressions and in no way any programmer. To get started I read the How To: Expressions and what do you know, you have an example on how to do exactly what I am looking for. However I think I found a typo/correction that may be needed? Again, not a programmer here.

    In the How To: Expressions with Entities section you state the new expression called open_perimeter_doors and give the example with the end of null : doorid. In the description you state you order them this way because when the door_sensor.state is true, the door is closed/secure. I have a few different brands of contact sensors and all of them are just the opposite. They are true when they are open and false when they are closed. For me, this was an easy fix. I swapped them.

    What blew my mind and took a bit of thinking was a little further down in your example of joining the getEntity ID and getName.

    join( each doorid in perimeter_doors: do
               e = getEntity( doorid ),
               e.attributes.door_sensor.state ? null : e.getName()
           done
        , ", " )
    

    The "e.getName()" in the example would cause the expression to never evaluate. I needed to change this to "e.name". With e already being set as "getEntity( doorid )", only name was needing to be appended. In your example you are appending ".getName()", resulting in "getEntity( doorid).getName()"

    Again, NOT a programmer, but perhaps a stale How To example from before a major update to the expression logic? Just wanted to share my results in case the manual does need an update.

    295ee66b-f5a2-437f-8686-4a835db6c02d-image.png

    Multi-System Reactor

  • Reactor Ex Machina
    3 3rdStng

    I'm not in need of it. As I was moving off Lighting Director I just happened to notice they had a max number of lights. I think the OG DeusExMachina did too. I think how you have it would be more lifelike. Especially when you couple of a few specific OFF rules so the lights turn off faster than 10-20 minutes.

    Multi-System Reactor
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved