Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. System integration roadmap
Set Reaction > Script Action
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
T
Good day all, I'm in the process of trying to shut down my 10 year old Linux home server that served many purposes, but primarily it's what I used for my NAS/Plex Media server. I migrated the NAS aspect of the server in November of last year to a true NAS solution (Ubiquti UNAS Pro), which is rack mount and much more efficient than my old tower, which it's only side benefit was heating my home office during the winter. Unfortunately it also means heating my home office during the summer, which were about to be in full swing. I have two things running on this 10 year old server at this point. MSR and pi-hole. I'm running Plex Media Server on Fedora Workstation in Podman on mini PC, which is much more energy efficient than my old tower. My next step is to migrate MSR. I know there are images of MSR out there, and creating it is well documented. I'm going to be using Podman instead of Docker for various reasons, but they work very similar. What I don't know, is what I need to do to migrate my existing Bare Metal installation over to a container. Has anyone done this? Any advice?
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
wmarcolinW
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
R
Hi guys, Just wondering how you guys organize your rule sets and rules. I wish I had an extra layer to have some more granularity, but my feature request was not popular. Maybe there are better ways to organize my rule sets. I use the rule sets now primarily for rooms. So a rule set per room. But maybe grouping by functionality works better. Any examples/ suggestions would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
Tom_DT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
M
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Need help reducing false positive notifications
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Deleting widgets
tunnusT
Hopefully a trivial question, but how do you delete widgets in a status page? Using build 22266
Multi-System Reactor
MQTT configuration question
tunnusT
I have the following yaml configuration in local_mqtt_devices file x_mqtt_device: set_speed: arguments: speed: type: str topic: "command/%friendly_name%" payload: type: json expr: '{ "fan": parameters.speed }' While this works fine, I'm wondering how this could be changed to "fixed" parameters, as in this case "fan" only accepts "A", "Q" or a numeric value of 1-5?
Multi-System Reactor
System Configuration Check - time is offset
F
Hi! I get this message when I'm on the status tab: System Configuration Check The time on this system and on the Reactor host are significantly different. This may be due to incorrect system configuration on either or both. Please check the configuration of both systems. The host reports 2025-04-01T15:29:29.252Z; browser reports 2025-04-01T15:29:40.528Z; difference 11.276 seconds. I have MSR installed as a docker on my Home Assistant Blue / Hardkernel ODROID-N2/N2+. MSR version is latest-25082-3c348de6. HA versions are: Core 2025.3.4 Supervisor 2025.03.4 Operating System 15.1 I have restarted HA as well as MSR multiple times. This message didn´t show two weeks ago. Don´t know if it have anything to do with the latest MSR version. Do anyone know what I can try? Thanks in advance! Let's Be Careful Out There (Hill Street reference...) /Fanan
Multi-System Reactor
Programmatically capture HTTP Request action status code or error
therealdbT
I have a very strange situation, where if InfluxDB restarts, other containers may fail when restarting at the same time (under not easy to understand circumstances), and InfluxDB remains unreachable (and these containers crashes). I need to reboot these containers in an exact order, after rebooting InfluxDB. While I understand what's going on, I need a way to reliable determine that InfluxDB is not reachable and these containers are not reachable, in order to identify this situation and manually check what's going on - and, maybe, in the future, automatically restart them if needed. So, I was looking at HTTP Request action, but I need to capture the HTTP response code, instead of the response (becase if ping is OK, InfluxDB will reply with a 204), and, potentially, a way to programmatically detect that it's failing to get the response. While I could write a custom HTTP controller for this or a custom HTTP virtual device, I was wondering if this is somewhat on you roadmap @toggledbits Thanks!
Multi-System Reactor
ZwaveJSUI - RGBWW BULB - Warm/Cold White interfered with RGB settings - Bulb doesn't change color if in WarmWhite state.
N
Hi , I'm on -Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25067-62e21a2d -Docker on Synology NAS -ZWaveJSUI 9.31.0.6c80945 Problem with ZwaveJSUI: When I try to change color to a bulb RGBWW, it doesn't change to the RGB color and the bulb remains warm or cold white. I tryed with Zipato RGBW Bulb V2 RGBWE2, Hank Bulb HKZW-RGB01, Aentec 6 A-ZWA002, so seems that it happens with all RGBWW bulb with reactor/zwavejsui. I'm using from reator the entity action: "rgb_color.set" and "rgb_color.set_rgb". After I send the reactor command, It changes in zwavejsui the rgb settings but doesn't put the white channel to "0", so the prevalent channel remains warm/cold White and the bulb doesn't change into the rgb color. This is the status of the bulb in zwavejsui after "rgb_color.set" (235,33,33,) and the bulb is still warmWhite. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor={"warmWhite":204,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} The "cold white" and "warm white" settings interfer with the rgb color settings. Reactor can change bulb colors with rgb_color set — (value, ui8, 0x000000 to 0xffffff) or rgb_color set_rgb — (red, green, blue, all ui1, 0 to 255) but if warm or cold white are not to "0", zwavejsui doesn't change them and I can't find a way to change into rgb or from rgb back to warm white. So if I use from reactor: rgb_color set_rgb — (235,33,33) in zwavejsui I have x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: targetColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: targetColor 14/03/2025, 16:43:57 - value updated Arg 0: └─commandClassName: Color Switch └─commandClass: 51 └─property: currentColor └─endpoint: 0 └─newValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─prevValue └──warmWhite: 204 └──coldWhite: 0 └──red: 235 └──green: 33 └──blue: 33 └─propertyName: currentColor In zwavejsui, the bulb changes rgb set but warm White remains to "204" and the bulb remais on warm White channel bacause is prevalent on rgb set. x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_0=204 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_1=0 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_2=235 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_3=33 x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_currentColor_4=33 Is it possible to targetColor also for "warmWhite" and "coldWhite" and have something similar to this? x_zwave_values.Color_Switch_targetColor={"warmWhite":0,"coldWhite":0,"red":235,"green":33,"blue":33} Thanks in advance.
Multi-System Reactor
Problem with simultaneous notifications.
T
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Problem after upgrading to 25067
R
MSR had been running fine, but I decided to follow the message to upgrade to 25067. Since the upgrade, I have received the message "Controller "<name>" (HubitatController hubitat2) could not be loaded at startup. Its ID is not unique." MSR throws the message on every restart. Has anyone else encountered this problem? I am running MSR on a Raspberry Pi4 connecting to two Hubitat units over an OpenVPN tunnel. One C8 and a C8 Pro. Both are up-to-date. It appears that despite the error message that MSR may be operating properly.
Multi-System Reactor
Global expressions not always evaluated
tunnusT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Local expression evaluation
V
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Runtime error when exiting global reaction that contains a group
S
I am getting a Runtime error on different browsers when I click exit when editing an existing or creating a new global reaction containing a group. If the global reaction does not have a group I don't get an error. I see a similar post on the forum about a Runtime Error when creating reactions but started a new thread as that appears to be solved. The Runtime Error is different in the two browsers Safari v18.3 @http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:44 You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community. Google Chrome 133.0.6943.142 TypeError: self.editor.isModified is not a function at HTMLButtonElement.<anonymous> (http://192.168.10.21:8111/reactor/en-US/lib/js/reaction-list.js:171:34) You may report this error, but do not screen shot it. Copy-paste the complete text. Remember to include a description of the operation you were performing in as much detail as possible. Report using the Reactor Bug Tracker (in your left navigation) or at the SmartHome Community. Steps to reproduce: Click the pencil to edit a global reaction with a group. Click the Exit button. Runtime error appears. or Click Create Reaction Click Add Action Select Group Add Condition such as Entity Attribute. Add an Action. Click Save Click Exit Runtime error appears. I don’t know how long the error has been there as I haven’t edited the global reaction in a long time. Reactor (Multi-hub) latest-25060-f32eaa46 Docker Mac OS: 15.3.1 Thanks
Multi-System Reactor
Cannot delete Global Expressions
SnowmanS
I am trying to delete a global expression (gLightDelay) but for some strange reason, it comes back despite clicking the Delete this expression and Save Changes buttons. I have not created a global expression for some times and just noticed this while doing some clean-up. I have upgraded Reactor to 25067 from 25060 and the behaviour is still there. I have restarted Reactor (as well as restarting its container) and cleared the browser's cache several times without success. Here's what the log shows. [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:22.690Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:26.254Z <GlobalExpression:NOTICE> Deleting global expression gLightDelay [latest-25067]2025-03-08T23:50:27.887Z <wsapi:INFO> [WSAPI]wsapi#1 rpc_echo [Object]{ "comment": "UI activity" } Reactor latest-25067-62e21a2d Docker on Synology NAS
Multi-System Reactor

System integration roadmap

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
21 Posts 10 Posters 1.3k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rafale77R Offline
    rafale77R Offline
    rafale77
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Opening a thread here for suggestions and discussions on future integrations to MSR.

    I'll jump in and give my wish list:

    Homekit
    Z-way through weksocket
    openLuup specific MQTT

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • therealdbT Offline
      therealdbT Offline
      therealdb
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I think something like ha-bridge but native could be huge as well. I could definitely help here.

      --
      On a mission to automate everything.

      My MS Reactor contrib
      My Luup Plug-ins

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSunL Offline
        LibraSun
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Well, if we're all piling on the BUILD-IT-ONCE-SO-ALL-MAY-PROFIT bandwagon, then allow me to toss another API into the ring:

        ecobee thermostats

        And if this ship has any fuel left in it after the first orbit, why not:

        IFTTT (or at least APILIO) integration (LOL!)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CatmanV2C Offline
          CatmanV2C Offline
          CatmanV2
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          HA bridge works wonderfully, but yes a native implementation would be brill

          C

          The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbitsT Offline
            toggledbits
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

            The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

            This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

            So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

            therealdbT cw-kidC 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • LibraSunL Offline
              LibraSunL Offline
              LibraSun
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I volunteer to:

              1. Hammer on all things msr/vera as released.
              2. Proofread any and all documentation.
              3. Continue filing bug reports with full data.
              4. Periodically send Patrick some beer money! ◄– as should everyone who respects his time and energy 🐶
              MatohlM 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • CatmanV2C Offline
                CatmanV2C Offline
                CatmanV2
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                In addition to 4 can I volunteer to stand around, sucking my teeth? 😉

                C

                The Ex-Vera abuser know as CatmanV2.....

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • LibraSunL LibraSun

                  I volunteer to:

                  1. Hammer on all things msr/vera as released.
                  2. Proofread any and all documentation.
                  3. Continue filing bug reports with full data.
                  4. Periodically send Patrick some beer money! ◄– as should everyone who respects his time and energy 🐶
                  MatohlM Offline
                  MatohlM Offline
                  Matohl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @librasun said in System integration roadmap:

                  Periodically send Patrick some beer money! ◄– as should everyone who respects his time and energy

                  Done

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • rafale77R Offline
                    rafale77R Offline
                    rafale77
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    From what I recall he likes Scotch better...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                      These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

                      The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

                      This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

                      So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

                      therealdbT Offline
                      therealdbT Offline
                      therealdb
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @toggledbits I’m more than happy to do mqtt and ha-bridge, to start. I’ve some open source time to invest (because I love to give back) and I’ll be more than happy to help.

                      --
                      On a mission to automate everything.

                      My MS Reactor contrib
                      My Luup Plug-ins

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • PerHP Offline
                        PerHP Offline
                        PerH
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I'd like to try a Domoticz integration, but spring usually brings more outdoor projects.. some day!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Offline
                          C Offline
                          cokeman
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          I'd love to see a docker addon for HA...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kidC Offline
                            cw-kid
                            wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                            #13

                            I'd like for the Home Remote dashboard app to support the MSR API. So I could add an MSR device object in to the Home Remote Designer and then see all my Global Reactions (Scenes) that are in MSR etc. I could then easily create dashboard "Scene" tiles to run these MSR Global Reactions from my dashboard interface.

                            But obviously that would be down to the Home Remote developer to add native support for it.

                            I was able to add a "HTTP Switch" in to the Home Remote Designer and send one HTTP command to MSR when the switch was turned ON in the dashboard app and send another HTTP command when the switch was turned OFF etc.

                            Using commands like:

                            http://MSR-IP:8111/api/v1/reaction/re-klkn8rxw/run
                            

                            It worked but I can see it being very time consuming creating these types of HTTP switches in the Home Remote dashboard, as its basically a plugin script in Home Remote and not the easiest thing to scale up and just create a load of new switches that can run various MSR Global Reactions.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • toggledbitsT toggledbits

                              These are all great ideas. What I'm working on at the moment changes the entity model a bit conceptually, not in implementation, and I want to get that in your collective hands and stabilized first, in case it breeds any necessary changes in the API. But, I'm happy to say, the implementation was pretty quick on my end -- while it has taken me most of the last two days, yesterday was really a short day (family events, hence no build last night) and I knocked out the changes for Hubitat and Hass, and today (about three hours so far) I've completed the Vera changes.

                              The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.

                              This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera. It's actually pretty tidy and nice on Hass and Hubitat. All of this will be in today's build, hopefully, if I can get through my testing. If there's no build today, this is why, as it's pretty much the only thing I've worked on since yesterday (and I have more family events this afternoon).

                              So, who's volunteering to build what? JavaScript required...

                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kid
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @toggledbits said in System integration roadmap:

                              The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.
                              This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera

                              Please can you explain this in more simple terms for us dummies.

                              Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                              All that devices various ServiceID's and variables ?

                              Thanks

                              toggledbitsT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cw-kidC cw-kid

                                @toggledbits said in System integration roadmap:

                                The gist is this: the updated controllers will be exposing every attribute and every action they can in a standard, stable interface at the rule and reaction level. The "lingua Franca" capabilities (power_switch, etc.) will still and always be present for use, and will represent their own stable interface across platforms, but it will no longer be strictly necessary for new and unrecognized devices to be mapped before use.
                                This is going to "fluff up" the list of attributes and actions in the UI, particularly on Vera

                                Please can you explain this in more simple terms for us dummies.

                                Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                                All that devices various ServiceID's and variables ?

                                Thanks

                                toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbits
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @cw-kid said in System integration roadmap:

                                Does this mean in MSR everything that Vera can see about a device, will now be seen and accessible in the MSR rules also?

                                Yes. In that respect, same as Reactor for Vera. Not user-friendly, but complete. The system-defined capabilities will still be there, like power_switch and dimming. You will able to use either.

                                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kid
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  OK well that's a good thing then. Will make it like PLEG also in that respect, where you can see and choose all ServiceID's and variables.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • LibraSunL Offline
                                    LibraSunL Offline
                                    LibraSun
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    I'd love to see native Google Calendar integration (in much the same way that GCal 3 plug-in currently offers I/O to a designated Google Calendar).

                                    Fun way to track past events and preset future triggers dynamically.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Matteburk
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Reolink Cameras with NVR ... would be lovely to trigger stuff with....

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • LibraSunL Offline
                                        LibraSunL Offline
                                        LibraSun
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Heck, if we're heading in that direction, then I toss RING Cameras and Doorbells into the hat. I realize that's a tall order from every perspective.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kidC Offline
                                          cw-kid
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Do those camera systems not have their own HTTP API ?

                                          I have Hikvision cameras and they have a HTTP API for controlling aspects of the cameras. So Vera and MSR or anything else can control them via HTTP requests.

                                          Turning on / off motion detection for example or starting a manual recording.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Set Reaction > Script Action
                                            wmarcolinW
                                            wmarcolin
                                            0
                                            3
                                            10

                                          • Advice reqeusted to migrate MSR from Bare Metal to Container
                                            T
                                            tamorgen
                                            0
                                            5
                                            72

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            5
                                            122
                                            37.3k

                                          • Z-Wave Future....
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            161

                                          • Can´t restart or upgrade/deploy MSR
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            111

                                          • [Solved] Limit HA Entity in MSR
                                            wmarcolinW
                                            wmarcolin
                                            0
                                            7
                                            230

                                          • Disaster recovery and virtualisation
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            5
                                            685

                                          • Remote access of Zwave stick from Z-wave server
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            3
                                            402

                                          • Organizing/ structuring rule sets and rules
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            5
                                            396

                                          • Moving MSR from a QNAP container to RP 5 - some issues
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            5
                                            373

                                          • Widget deletion does not work and landing page (status) is empy
                                            G
                                            gwp1
                                            0
                                            4
                                            362
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved