Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Discussion Forum to share and further the development of home control and automation, independent of platforms.
  1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Multi-System Reactor
  4. How to auto start on Rpi reboot ?
Script action and custom timers
therealdbT
Sorry to write here without trying, but I’m flying today. Am I correct if i say that script action with alarm() makes it possible to execute a reaction in a given interval, lets say 15 seconds or 3.5 minutes? That sounds amazing, since I’ve used weird tricks, including a custom controller, just to do this.
Multi-System Reactor
Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
M
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from a Raspberry Pi 4 (ARMv7) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (ARMv8/aarch64), but I’ve run into an issue: there is no proper ARMv8/aarch64 image available. None of the existing images run on the Pi 5 - they all exit immediately with code 139 (segmentation fault), which typically indicates that the binaries inside the image are not compatible with the ARM64/aarch64 architecture used by the Pi 5. Would it be possible to publish a correct ARMv8/aarch64 (linux/arm64) image? Building one should be relatively straightforward using docker buildx with multi-arch support. For example, my own Node.js images are built this way: docker buildx build --push \ -t <localrepo>/<project>:<tag> \ --platform=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 \ --file ./apps/<project>/Dockerfile . This produces both the AMD64 and ARM64/v8 variants automatically. Also, as a side note, it may be best to avoid using Alpine as the base image for the ARM64 build, since musl-based builds often cause compatibility issues and unnecessary headaches. A glibc-based base image (e.g., Debian or Ubuntu) tends to work far more reliably on ARM64, especially for Node.js applications. @toggledbits - tagging you in case you missed this. Thanks, mgvra
Multi-System Reactor
Help resolve change in behaviour post update
CatmanV2C
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
toggledbitsT
Build 21228 has been released. Docker images available from DockerHub as usual, and bare-metal packages here. Home Assistant up to version 2021.8.6 supported; the online version of the manual will now state the current supported versions; Fix an error in OWMWeatherController that could cause it to stop updating; Unify the approach to entity filtering on all hub interface classes (controllers); this works for device entities only; it may be extended to other entities later; Improve error detail in messages for EzloController during auth phase; Add isRuleSet() and isRuleEnabled() functions to expressions extensions; Implement set action for lock and passage capabilities (makes them more easily scriptable in some cases); Fix a place in the UI where 24-hour time was not being displayed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
CrilleC
@toggledbits Do you know if this is related to that PR or is it a change they made in 2025.11.1? [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.319Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag with { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.320Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "10:45", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": (null) }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_dag" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984320<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "10:45" }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_dag failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.321Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"10:45","datetime":null,"timestamp":null},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_dag"},"id":1762866984320} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 0 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "10:45" } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.322Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 1 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt with { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.323Z <HassController:INFO> HassController#hass: sending payload for x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt action: { "type": "call_service", "service_data": { "date": (null), "time": "03:00", "datetime": (null), "timestamp": 0 }, "domain": "input_datetime", "service": "set_datetime", "target": { "entity_id": "input_datetime.vvb_natt" } } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:ERR> HassController#hass request 1762866984323<2025-11-11 14:16:24> (call_service) failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:WARN> HassController#hass action x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime({ "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 }) on Entity#hass>input_datetime_vvb_natt failed! [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service call payload: {"type":"call_service","service_data":{"date":null,"time":"03:00","datetime":null,"timestamp":0},"domain":"input_datetime","service":"set_datetime","target":{"entity_id":"input_datetime.vvb_natt"},"id":1762866984323} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <HassController:INFO> Service data: {"fields":{"date":{"example":"\"2019-04-20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"time":{"example":"\"05:04:20\"","selector":{"time":{}}},"datetime":{"example":"\"2019-04-20 05:04:20\"","selector":{"text":{"multiline":false,"multiple":false}}},"timestamp":{"selector":{"number":{"min":0,"max":9223372036854776000,"mode":"box","step":1}}}},"target":{"entity":[{"domain":["input_datetime"]}]}} [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:ERR> Engine#1 reaction rule-mgb8pfhs:S step 1 perform x_hass_input_datetime.set_datetime failed: [Error] Not a parseable type for dictionary value @ data['date'] [-] [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.324Z <Engine:INFO> Engine#1 action args: { "time": "03:00", "timestamp": 0 } [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Resuming reaction Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> (rule-mgb8pfhs:S) from step 2 [latest-25310]2025-11-11T13:16:24.325Z <Engine:INFO> Sätt Schema VVB i Home Assistant<AKTIV> all actions completed.
Multi-System Reactor
Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
P
Hello, I currently have an office light (connected via a Leviton Zwave Dimmer switch) controlled from a Gen5 Aeotech Zwave switch installed on my Synology 720+ NAS. I run HA(2025.11.10) in a virtual machine from my NAS and Reactor on the container manager of the same NAS. Prior to updating to 25304 the rule I had set to turn the light on to a specific dimming value worked correctly. Now the rule appears to follow the decision tree, however the reaction does not trigger setting the dimming or turning on the office light? Strangely I can still turn the light on and off as well as dim it directly from HASS..? I have tried using the ''try this action'' button in the rules reaction setting and it will not control the light and does not throw an error flagÉ Please help, P.S Reactor has been rock steady for me over the last few years and I'm a big fan of this solution.
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
CrilleC
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
CatmanV2C
FWIW I'm no longer getting a notification from MSR that there's an update. Just thought I'd mention it C
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Variables not updating correctly in latest-25201-2aa18550
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
The reaction stopped working (Google Nest max playing a video)
F
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
Handling Dead Entities and Renamed Entities
PablaP
Hello all.. been a minute! I recently rebuilt my Z wave network and migrated to a new z wave stick. In order to prevent any downtime I kept my original z wave network up and ran a docker version of Z Wave JS UI with my new controller. This way I could add device by device without having any devices down. I finally moved all the devices over to my new stick today. The final step was to migrate everything from my Docker instance of Z Wave JS UI to the HA add-on of Z Wave JS UI. However during this migration some of the names didn't populate correctly which I later managed to import back into Z Wave JS UI. The issue was in Reactor it is stuck on the default names and the entities are not updating. I removed the controller from Reactor, restarted, hard refreshed, and added the controller back however the new entity names have not updated. Also it seems like the old entities from my previous instance of Z Wave JS UI are lingering and not being marked as dead (I believe a certain amount of time needs to lapse before they're marked as dead in Reactor). My goal is to basically purge all the entities for the 'ZWaveJS' controller in Reactor so it can pull all the updated entity names and only the entities that exist in Z Wave JS UI. I cannot find a quick way to do this, I know entities can be deleted one by one, but with over 100 entities this would take long I am guessing that if I added the controller with a new name in in the Reactor config it would pull the updated entities and names but I think that would break my rules since the entity IDs would change (I made sure to name all the entities the exact same as they were previously to prevent this issue).
Multi-System Reactor
Strange behavior for MQTT templates using payload and attributes
therealdbT
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[MSR] reactor-mqtt-contrib package for additional MQTT templates
therealdbT
I'm slowly migrating all my stuff to MQTT under MSR, so I have a central place to integrate everything (and, in a not-so-distant future, to remove virtual devices from my Vera and leave it running zwave only). Anyway, here's my reactor-mqtt-contrib package: https://github.com/dbochicchio/reactor-mqtt-contrib Simply download yaml files (everything or just the ones you need) and you're good to go. I have mapped my most useful devices, but I'll add others soon. Feel free to ask for specific templates, since I've worked a lot in the last weeks to understand and operate them. The templates are supporting both init and query, so you have always up-to-date devices at startup, and the ability to poll them. Online status is supported as well, so you can get disconnected devices with a simple expression. Many-many thanks to @toggledbits for its dedication, support, and patience with me and my requests
Multi-System Reactor
HA 2025.9.4 Supported Yet?
CatmanV2C
Tangentially did I miss 2025.9.4 getting blessed in MSR? I've been holding off Cheers C
Multi-System Reactor
Rule Set UI bug - RESOLVED
3
Topic thumbnail image
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Copy&Paste of Rules
therealdbT
I don't know if I'm the only one, but managing more than one Reactor installs, the need to have some sort of copy&paste for rules has grown on me. While I understand the technical challenges, I'm wondering if a "god mode" where I could copy the raw JSON rule and paste it into another rule could be an advanced, flag only feature that could benefit power users. I know I can copy the JSON file and proceed, but I must stop Reactor and when doing maintenance, it's more clicks to do. Just an idea
Multi-System Reactor
[Reactor] Help with scene controller cycling logic
therealdbT
I’ve added a couple of Shelly Wave i4 as scene controllers and I’m planning to add more, since I can just use standard buttons instead of battery-powered scene controllers, which also looks better aesthetically. That said, I’m struggling to figure out how to write a simple rule that cycles between states every time I press a button. Example: Light 1 ON → OFF, then Light 2 ON → OFF. The part I can’t get right is handling the case where Light 1 or Light 2 might already be ON independently of the rule. Maybe it’s just too much sun and relaxation clouding my brain, but any hint would be appreciated.
Multi-System Reactor
Stop the MSR by an external switch on Hubitat.
wmarcolinW
Use case: When performing home maintenance, such as air conditioning, I want all rules involving air conditioning to be disabled. To do this, to day, I have a virtual switch that I placed within all rules involving air conditioning, meaning that if I turn it off, none of them work. Then another situation: the water pump system and garden irrigation, another switch. In short, I had to create several virtual switches in Hubitat to disable rules in MSR. Unfortunately, however, I was unable to cover all scenarios, so I wondered if it would be possible for MSR to support a virtual MSR switch, which, when configured in the reactor settings, would function as a general on/off switch for MSR. If it is configured and turned off, the entire rules and actions in MSR stops working, except for the status change reading process, specifically for this switch, which, when turned on, would restart the MSR. Would it be possible to do something like this? Any recommendations from the experts?
Multi-System Reactor

How to auto start on Rpi reboot ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multi-System Reactor
26 Posts 6 Posters 4.4k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kidC Offline
    cw-kid
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi

    Do we have any instructions yet to follow for auto starting the MSR service on a Raspberry Pi after its rebooted?

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rafale77R Offline
      rafale77R Offline
      rafale77
      wrote on last edited by rafale77
      #2

      Assuming you are running on raspbian as a systemctl service, shouldn't enabling it do it?

      sudo systemctl enable msr.service

      Maybe you didn't create a service yet?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kidC Offline
        cw-kid
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Yes its Raspbian.

        I haven't created or done anything yet.

        I am running MSR currently by using this command:

        nohup ./app.sh &

        Which I am running by using Putty on my Windows 10 laptop.

        rafale77R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cw-kidC cw-kid

          Yes its Raspbian.

          I haven't created or done anything yet.

          I am running MSR currently by using this command:

          nohup ./app.sh &

          Which I am running by using Putty on my Windows 10 laptop.

          rafale77R Offline
          rafale77R Offline
          rafale77
          wrote on last edited by rafale77
          #4

          @cw-kid

          If such is the case, create the service by creating the file

          using putty logged in to your rpi:

          sudo nano /etc/systemd/system/msr.service
          

          paste in the following file content make sure the path to msr below is correct and change it if necessary:

          [Unit]
          Description=Multi System Reactor
          After=network.target
          
          [Service]
          Type=simple
          ExecStart=nohup /home/user/msr/app.sh
          Restart=on-failure
          RestartSec=5s
          
          [Install]
          WantedBy=multi-user.target
          

          Hit ctrl+o then ctrl+x to save and exit from nano.

          reload the service daemon:

          sudo systemctl daemon-reload
          

          then enable the service

          sudo systemctl enable msr
          

          You can then start and top the service with the two commands:

          sudo systemctl start msr
          sudo systemctl stop msr
          
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kidC Offline
            cw-kid
            wrote on last edited by cw-kid
            #5

            In Nano it says [ Error writing /etc/systemd/system/msr.service: Permission denied ] when trying to save the file.

            I then tried this instead:

            sudo nano /etc/systemd/system/msr.service
            

            And it saved and I now have a file called msr.service in that directory.

            After this command

            sudo systemctl enable msr

            It says

            Failed to enable unit: Invalid argument

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kidC Offline
              cw-kid
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              These are the file details / permissions

              7c4df2f6-4901-44a7-89f0-3c9ff6b8fdc2-image.png

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kidC Offline
                cw-kid
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                This was the contents of the msr.service file.

                I had to change the path slightly.

                [Unit]
                Description=Multi System Reactor
                After=network.target
                
                [Service]
                Type=simple
                ExecStart=nohup /home/pi/Documents/reactor/app.sh
                Restart=on-failure
                RestartSec=5s
                
                [Install]
                WantedBy=multi-user.target
                
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbitsT Offline
                  toggledbits
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I would add User=pi at a minimum to the service section.

                  I have concerns about the stop action. Investigating...

                  Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rafale77R Offline
                    rafale77R Offline
                    rafale77
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Thanks, I did miss the sudo for the nano command to create the file.

                    The path does look suspicious too in addition to @toggledbits input. There may be other specificities about raspbian I may be missing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kidC Offline
                      cw-kid
                      wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                      #10

                      I made a mistake in the msr.service file. Corrected and now the "sudo systemctl enable msr" command runs with no error.

                      I then rebooted the Pi but some time later I still cannot load MSR in the browser.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kidC Offline
                        cw-kid
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        This is the contents of the msr.service file now

                        [Unit]
                        Description=Multi System Reactor
                        After=network.target
                        
                        [Service]
                        User=pi
                        Type=simple
                        ExecStart=nohup /home/pi/Documents/reactor/app.sh
                        Restart=on-failure
                        RestartSec=5s
                        
                        [Install]
                        WantedBy=multi-user.target
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • rafale77R Offline
                          rafale77R Offline
                          rafale77
                          wrote on last edited by rafale77
                          #12

                          can you show the error by posting the output of

                          sudo systemctl status msr
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbitsT Offline
                            toggledbits
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            There are several things to indicate that the process is not ready for this at this point. Among them is that the nodejs installation done by the installer is local to the pi user. There are also issues with the home directory, and the search paths for modules and data relative to the current working directory vs the path of the application.

                            Too soon. Not ready yet. Not going to fix it tonight. This is prelease software. It isn't mean to run like production software at this point.

                            Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kidC Offline
                              cw-kid
                              wrote on last edited by cw-kid
                              #14

                              Think I have it working now and MSR is auto starting after a reboot

                              I placed my msr.service file in this directory:

                              /home/pi/Documents/reactor

                              Using WinSCP, on the msr.service file properties, I made its Group and Owner to be pi rather than root.

                              This is the files contents:

                              [Unit]
                              Description=Multi System Reactor
                              After=network.target
                              
                              [Service]
                              Type=simple
                              ExecStart=nohup ./app.sh &
                              WorkingDirectory=/home/pi/Documents/reactor
                              Restart=on-failure
                              RestartSec=5s
                              
                              [Install]
                              WantedBy=multi-user.target
                              

                              I then ran these commands in the terminal in Putty:

                              sudo systemctl enable /home/pi/Documents/reactor/msr.service
                              
                              sudo systemctl start msr
                              

                              And I can check its status with this command:

                              sudo systemctl status msr
                              

                              It says its active and running.

                              If I reboot the Pi now after the reboot the MSR web page is then available and can be accessed.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbitsT Offline
                                toggledbits
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Yeah, but running the shell script is not correct. You're basically having systemd do what the shell script is also doing (restarting when stopped), and it's going to cause problems. Your exec is also forking, so adding yet another layer of indirection that all but guarantees that systemd is going to be looking at the wrong process ID for what it thinks is a running Reactor. That could lead to problems stopping and restarting, and with the possible effect that an incorrect stop causes data loss.

                                Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kidC Offline
                                  cw-kid
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Didn't think I'd set it up correctly 😕 More of a hack to get it auto started.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbitsT Offline
                                    toggledbits
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    You're not far off, really, but the devilish details require some internal knowledge of how Reactor starts and organizes itself, and it's made a bit more complicated by the necessity to locate things "off shore" for docker containers and make sure that stays working as well. There's a bit of a balancing act there. As I'm sure you know well, features are not strictly governed by their ability to be implemented; they are also very much a function of what it takes to support them. I'd rather there be an "official" way that I know people use, because if ten people do it their own way, I'll have ten different ways I need to figure out any time there's a problem.

                                    Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • PerHP Offline
                                      PerHP Offline
                                      PerH
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Can I ask what data one could loose in a power outage? I presume that any setup (rules/expressions) change is written to persistent files on "save"?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbitsT Offline
                                        toggledbits
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Right now, all data is written when modified, but that may not always be the case, and there's a high likelihood it will be user-configurable, even.

                                        One of the things designed in is that MSR is "crappy-storage-ready". @rafale77 can tell you at length about the merits and woes of various storage technologies, and an SD card in a Raspberry Pi is no exception (in fact, probably both a good example and a dire warning). MSR has a storage architecture for its data that allows "pluggable" storage disciplines, so you could, for example, choose a cached-with-delayed-write-back mechanism to reduce wear, and you could choose that for everything, or just states, or states and logs, etc. So in that case, as the system shuts down, it is necessary for the cache to write back any "dirty" (modified but unsaved as yet) data, or the modifications would be lost.

                                        That said, you should be thinking about getting your Pi off an SD card if that's what you're running, if you intend to run it full-time with MSR and depend on it. There are only two types of SD cards: those that have failed, and those that are about to. I have my Pi running on a cheap 2.5" SSD, and it's also a good bit faster, although there is some alchemy to getting that working, and while it's much better than it was, it involves some pretty magical incantations still today and can be a bit angst-inducing.

                                        Author of Multi-system Reactor and Reactor, DelayLight, Switchboard, and about a dozen other plugins that run on Vera and openLuup.

                                        Black CatB 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • MatohlM Offline
                                          MatohlM Offline
                                          Matohl
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          With the newer firmwares to the RPi it is fairly straight forward to use a SSD since it has native support now. Not that much alchemy anymore.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Recent Topics

                                          • Script action and custom timers
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            4
                                            70

                                          • Requesting a proper ARM64/aarch64 Docker image (Pi 5 support)
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            1
                                            2
                                            36

                                          • Help resolve change in behaviour post update
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            0
                                            12
                                            215

                                          • Reactor (Multi-System/Multi-Hub) Announcements
                                            CatmanV2C
                                            CatmanV2
                                            5
                                            128
                                            72.7k

                                          • There is an alternative to homebridge-mqttthing
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            1
                                            2
                                            74

                                          • Reactor w/HA 2025.11 error on set_datetime service call setting only time
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            6
                                            79

                                          • Reactor Version 25310 : Office Light control via rule in reactor no longer working since last update.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            17
                                            278

                                          • Shelly Wall Display XL
                                            akbooerA
                                            akbooer
                                            2
                                            9
                                            683

                                          • [Solved] alarm() in global expression throws error in log.
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            26
                                            483

                                          • [Solved] Define function issue in latest-25304
                                            CrilleC
                                            Crille
                                            0
                                            12
                                            354

                                          • No Upgrade Notification for Build 25308?
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            85

                                          • Strange behavior in MSR latest-25304 with disabled groups in Reaction
                                            toggledbitsT
                                            toggledbits
                                            0
                                            2
                                            119
                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          Hosted freely by 10RUPTiV - Solutions Technologiques | Contact us
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Unsolved