Skip to content
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    573 Views
    G
    @mgvra the landing page issue was addressed here as a side note in another issue thread: https://smarthome.community/post/16764
  • 0 Votes
    7 Posts
    762 Views
    T
    @toggledbits, I tried to go about the way you mentioned, but I don't think it was quite suited for my purpose. The purpose of the rule is to send a notification through Home Assistant to my phone, and I didn't want a delay that I believe your method would have introduced. What I came up with was creating a global variable and a helper rule, that sets the global variable to true when the 300 seconds is exceeded of power being above 3.7. [image: 1744127635657-b0f50fcc-a06f-49a6-9ccb-38f718d7cc42-image-resized.png] [image: 1744127574793-88547953-dbd8-4646-80a9-48b03a6c09ad-image-resized.png] Then there is a Variable Value check in the Triggers of the Notification rule: [image: 1744127400119-8b91b3c4-cc46-44db-a4f1-a76408f7c79b-image-resized.png] The Reaction resets the Global rule back to false, after the cycle is completed. It may not be the most elegant method, but it reduces the false positives on my phone when the cycle selector is bumped. For the same reason, I have the reactor uptime checked, because I would get tons of notifications on my phone when I did an update to MSR, or when my server was rebooted. I know I could completely encapsulate the logic within MSR, but the overly simplistic sensor in HAAS serves it's own purpose in HAAS for my dashboard, and HAAS can't read rule states from MSR, so for my purpose, I already have the simple sensor in place, so why reinvent the wheel?
  • Deleting widgets

    Locked Multi-System Reactor
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    662 Views
    toggledbitsT
    As of build 24343, widget deletion is accomplished by dragging the widget to the top navigation bar (only). Dragging to the left margin no longer deletes the widget.
  • MQTT configuration question

    Solved Multi-System Reactor
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    901 Views
    tunnusT
    Hint: for debugging, when you run an action, MQTTController logs the exact topic and full payload being published at INFO level by default. I've used MQTTX, which I can highly recommend
  • System Configuration Check - time is offset

    Multi-System Reactor
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    873 Views
    G
    @toggledbits I have indeed used the code... and no, this isn't critical. Once I saw MSR was running and working as intended I moved on. Release AYC. @Fanan Re time sync: I did a apt-get install systemd-timesyncd on the Proxmox host. I've not seen the warning since.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    590 Views
    therealdbT
    So, an empty string is 200ish, otherwise error/timeout is null? That works, thank you!
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    766 Views
    toggledbitsT
    First, always look at the logs. I'm 100% certain that "nothing happens" isn't what's in the logs. It looks like the device has separate targetValue values for the white channels, so you may just need to use those. That means for red, green, and blue, you'll use targetValue for the property with a JSON object, but leave the propertyKey blank. For warm white, you use property targetValue with propertyKey zero (0), and for cold white you'll use propertyKey one (1). Edit: look at the logs
  • Problem with simultaneous notifications.

    Multi-System Reactor
    1
    2
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    257 Views
    No one has replied
  • Problem after upgrading to 25067

    Multi-System Reactor
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    417 Views
    R
    I reviewed my Reactor configuration file. Some time ago I had duplicated one of the hubitat device sections in anticipation of making changes to my extended LAN. While one entry was marked as "enabled: false", it seems that MSR did not like the duplicate ID even though the duplicate was disabled. I added and "X" to the "id" and "name" of the duplicated entry and the error messages ceased. Thanks for the help
  • Global expressions not always evaluated

    Multi-System Reactor
    3
    2
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    369 Views
    tunnusT
    @toggledbits great! Will this fix make it to the next build?
  • [Solved] Local expression evaluation

    Multi-System Reactor
    13
    2
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views
    tunnusT
    @toggledbits the main thing is that now I know that this behaviour is not a bug and there's a clear alternative (not using global variables when rule does not trigger often enough). Anyway, MSR is a great software and thanks for your continued support!
  • 0 Votes
    7 Posts
    942 Views
    G
    @toggledbits Confirmed.
  • Cannot delete Global Expressions

    Multi-System Reactor
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    395 Views
    SnowmanS
    The new built fixed the issue. Thanks for the fast response. Much appreciated.
  • Advice on Storing and Backing Up Bind Mounts - Docker

    Software
    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    732 Views
    therealdbT
    @Pabla said in Advice on Storing and Backing Up Bind Mounts - Docker: Perfect thats exactly what I was thinking of doing! Since I am using Portainer their equivalent of Docker Compose is Stacks and Portainer has a handy built in GUI back up feature which backs all that up. Just need to figure out how to automate it and store it off the host for easy future retrieval. Portainer is just a nice GUI - I'm using it too to do basic stuff like restarting a container or see the logs, especially when I'm remote. But at the end of the day, it's just some GUI over docker/docker-compose CLI commands: cd /home/casa/containers/zwavejs/ && sudo docker compose pull && sudo docker compose up -d and you're good to go. Easier to run 5-6 times per container than clicking on some random web page, but I know it's personal. The only thing that matters is a disaster/recovery strategy that you'll be able to quickly follow.
  • Local notification methods?

    Multi-System Reactor
    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    5k Views
    toggledbitsT
    @therealdb said in Local notification methods?: @toggledbits time for a custom mqtt template LOL! I think for one topic, it might be a bit of overkill, but then, that's kind of how we roll, isn't it?
  • RFC: When disaster strikes (sorry it's a bit verbose)

    Unsolved General Discussion
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    1k Views
    CatmanV2C
    OK here's a useful resource: https://www.reddit.com/r/synology/comments/16tmjoc/the_synology_ram_megathread_ii/ With a linked sheet of all results that people have entered. Despite the thread I originally found, no one has got that particular RAM to work on the sheet. There's another Crucial item: CCT16G4SFD824A Which has 10 reports of working in the 224+ Return initiated, new RAM arriving tomorrow. £10 more expensive so £35. <edit> New RAM in and booted fine. Takes a little longer to come up (I assume it takes a bit longer to check 18G of RAM than 2G I think I'll start another thread about how I'm going to do this. C
  • AltUI sans internet connection

    Software
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    645 Views
    A
    Just on AltUI: The browser would be downloading any number of resources first time round from various servers. But I would have thought the majority of servers would be using some sort of cache control header combinations to the command the browser's caching. You don't need to be downloading jquery every time you hit a web page and I think it's unlikely that would be happening. So I would have thought that the browser (for AltUI) could have cached most of what AltUI needed? What resource is the browser calling up that it can't download with the internet connection down? Maybe AltUI could have functioned but in some sort of reduced capability mode? But yes the openLuup console, as I understand it, has been written to not rely overly on outside resources. Surprising akbooer could get it work!!
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    373 Views
    No one has replied
  • Custom capabilities in MQTT templates

    Multi-System Reactor
    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    805 Views
    toggledbitsT
    That is cool. I really love stuff that combines simple, available IoT bits with the old greasy bits to solve problems. It appeals to my libertarian steampunk fantasy of how I'd run my home, which unfortunately far exceeds my wife's tolerance for the lower limits of luxury over sustainability.
  • 0 Votes
    16 Posts
    1k Views
    toggledbitsT
    The alerts persisting is a sync problem with the alerts data object. I've found and (hopefully) fixed it for the next build. Both it and the Controller Status widget need special handing when the API connection is restarted.

Recent Topics