-
I've just started to look at HASS UI, and have seen enough to see that it has an infinite number of ways to show enitites and devices in all forms and shapes.. But for starters i'd like to have something familiar, so how do i go about getting a sidebar for rooms like in openluup?
I know i can put them in the actual left sidebar, but i'd prefer to keep that for configuration pages..
on each room page i'd like to sort the lights, the heaters, the sensors together, and i saw somewhere that HASS will do that for you if you play your cards (pun) right.. can't find it again now..
Any pointers to a beginner?
-
Relates to Vera integration in Home Assistant
Just for you to be aware.
If you are using plugs (or whatever) in Vera to measure energy for your appliances this is deprecated in 2022.4.0 since the HA integration to Vera is not updated and maintained anymore.2022.3.8:
Skärmavbild 2022-04-14 kl. 19.54.47.png2022.4.3:
Skärmavbild 2022-04-14 kl. 20.48.06.pngTime to move away from Vera for z-wave ...
Link to HA thread:
Apr 8 Update 2022.4.0/ Remove energy usage/ VERA Update 2022.4.0/ Remove energy usage/ VERA
Yes, it can truly be a hard time to keep up with all the changes and sadly that no one maintains Vera no more. The REST sensor can make it live a bit longer at least for now… sensor: - platform: rest name: "ender_kwh" resource: http://IP_OF_VERA:3480...
-
Domoticz (used for zigbee integration) have been bothering me so much that i've been looking at HomeAssistant to replace it. Now that Z-way is moving in with an integration, its even more tempting..
But i don't like the idea of having it as an OS that I can't use for other things, and running the HASS Core in a docker seems to be somewhat reduced in terms of addons?
I realize that HASSOS is using docker for integrations or addons, but can I still use docker compose to set up my own dockers (i.e z-way, influx, grafana) there as well?
I guess i'm getting old, change is difficult! 😉
-
I've integrated Reactor and Z-Way Expert panel in my HA UI, but as it is iFrame, it will not work if I log in from the outside.
It would be great to access these in case my wife finds an automation flaw while I'm elsewhere, which seems to be the rule of thumb..
If I understand this right, all the dockers(reactor, z-way) host their own web server on the port, so it should be possible to get this throuh the HA "tunnel"(VPN or whatever its called)?
I noticed that my Octoprint camera is integrated differently, and can be seen on external connection as well even if i only give it a local address in setup?
-
(Not sure it's the right HA bridge but....)
I have a selection of HA bridge devices to enable Alexa integration. They all work perfectly except one that has just (48 hours) started saying that it's un responsive with Alexa. If I go to the HA bridge and test on / test off it works absolutely perfectly.
I've deleted and renamed from the Alexa App but no change. Simply says 'Device Un-responsive'
Any thoughts?
TIA
C
-
Hello,
I am currently running Home Assistant and Vera at the same time. I have installed a couple of ZEN32 5 button controllers but having issues getting the additional buttons to control my Vera devices. Am using the ZEN32 (Z-wave JS) blueprint which works well for devices on HASS. In developer tools I can use the Light:Toggle service and toggle my kitchen light through Vera. If I create the same action through the ZEN blueprint it doesn't work.Anyone have any thoughts?
Roger
-
Hi!
Since a couple of days, I'm not able to use the TTS in MSR (HA). I haven't done anything else but updated HA. Don't know if that's the source of the problem. Have this happened to anyone else, or is it just me?
When I searched in the HA community, there seems to be a croud of people having this issue - but they often refers to Alexa, so they may not have my problems.I took a snapshot of a MSR instance, where it shows that the TTS is missing. I use to have 4 different TTS engines to choose from - now I have none. Am I alone in this?
-
Hi!
I have had big troubles connecting HA to MSR. Finally I found out that MSR will work as long as my HA-installation is http, and not https.
Is it possible to bypass that limitation even with https? -
Opening a thread to discuss updates to my home assistant fork.
rafale77/core rafale77/core:house_with_garden: Open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first - rafale77/core
I am trying to keep it on par with the official one but have made quite a few tweaks focused on video handling and processing. Home Assistant being developed on python is a great base for integration of machine learning and deep learning models into smarthomes because it is one of the most common languages used in the field.
As of today, I updated the readme file and the version to match the latest official release.
-
Most of my spoken commands to Alexa go something like this:
"Alexa, time for bed"at which point she executes a pre-planned Routine (triggered by that spoken phrase). The routine may turn On a virtual switch (named, say, "VS: Time for Bed" on my Vera Plus, but known to the Alexa Smart Home skill as "Time for Bed" just to keep my sanity).
The VS is a child device of Switchboard plug-in (by @toggledbits ) and acts as a binary (On/Off) light switch. Typically, I'll instruct Reactor to turn the switch back off -- or, more commonly, have it set to turn itself back off after NN seconds in the Switchboard UI. In other words, it's just a brief Trigger for a Reactor routine or Vera scene.
Now, here's my question: In order to avoid creating dozens of virtual switches -- one for each Routine / Scene -- has anyone tried using a DIMMER instead?
Seems to me that a dimming device, since it can be set to 100 different "brightness levels", could trigger 100 different responses in Reactor. But I'm hesitant to try this arrangement until I know others have had success, and that the faux "dimming" process won't inadvertently trigger intermediate values (e.g. "ramping") along the way.
Eager to hear if this alternative workflow makes sense and is practical, insofar as "Binary" and "Dimmer" seem to be the only switch types that Vera allows Alexa to "see" on Discovery.
Thanks! - Libra
-
Paulus Schoutsen / Mar 17, 2021 Nabu Casa has acquired ESPHome Nabu Casa has acquired ESPHomeNabu Casa has acquired ESPHome to ensure that the project can continue to flourish as a free and open source project.
-
They are moving fast...
Franck Nijhof / Mar 2, 2021 2021.3: My Oh My 2021.3: My Oh MyIntroducing My Home Assistant, a new UI for service calls, 100% Fans, Z-Wave JS updates and Supervisor updates.
Considering changing to HA - but what installation method?
-
Domoticz (used for zigbee integration) have been bothering me so much that i've been looking at HomeAssistant to replace it. Now that Z-way is moving in with an integration, its even more tempting..
But i don't like the idea of having it as an OS that I can't use for other things, and running the HASS Core in a docker seems to be somewhat reduced in terms of addons?
I realize that HASSOS is using docker for integrations or addons, but can I still use docker compose to set up my own dockers (i.e z-way, influx, grafana) there as well?
I guess i'm getting old, change is difficult!
-
I’m running ha on docker and it’s doing great for me.I have a couple of external integrations installed, no major problems to report.
-
But no community add-ons menu then, i presume?
I'm also running a docker with HA Core on my test bench, and i'm just wondering if i'm going to miss that add-on menu..
-
@perh The addon menu is just a docker containers, you have all of them as a separate docker which you can install.
-
aha, cool. Is this procedure described somewhere? how to connect them to the core and such..
-
What’s in this menu that’s not available via haccs? I mean, I’ll eventually add zwave2mqtt and zigbee2mqtt and I’m fine with them being two separate containers.
-
Like @therealdb , I run HA in a docker container. I have HACS installed, and don't have any issue getting the add-ons I need installed. I have several other containers running on the same host, as you might imagine.
-
Sounds good! Kind of a strange path HA has taken, with a separate OS which needs to be alone and un-touched? I understand why offcourse, but i would think a slightly different approach to dockers would solve that?
It's probably on the roadmap.. -
It depends... use docker as host or a hypervisor such as proxmox or esxi. On top of which you can also run an os with docker. I use both... esxi with homeassistant os (which usedls docker under the hood) because of backup options qith synology active backup for business - snapshot backup). And another with proxmox with vms and lxc container with docker inside that (easy to restart and not to run docker on proxmoxx directly). It all runs very wel for years. I would advise if not very knowledgeable with docker to run homeassistant os in a vm on a hypervisor.
-
@perh said in Considering changing to HA - but what installation method?:
Domoticz (used for zigbee integration) have been bothering me so much that i've been looking at HomeAssistant to replace it. Now that Z-way is moving in with an integration, its even more tempting..
But i don't like the idea of having it as an OS that I can't use for other things, and running the HASS Core in a docker seems to be somewhat reduced in terms of addons?
I realize that HASSOS is using docker for integrations or addons, but can I still use docker compose to set up my own dockers (i.e z-way, influx, grafana) there as well?
I guess i'm getting old, change is difficult!
Z-way with an integration? Where did you find that?
-
I run HA inside Docker on my Synology NAS along with MSR, Grafana and InfluxDB without any issues. Also have a few integrations such as HACS, Vera Plus (Z-Wave Devices), Rachio and MyQ running without major problems. Having all the CPU and memory the NAS can offer and how (Synology) Docker manages the resources made it easy for me to go that route.
-
@sender said in Considering changing to HA - but what installation method?:
Z-way with an integration? Where did you find that?
Add support of Z-Wave.Me Z-Way and RaZberry server by PoltoS · Pull Request #61182 · home-assistant/core
Breaking change Proposed change Type of change Dependency upgrade Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) New integration (thank you!) New feature (which adds functionality to an ...
The first integration step is done as far as I can see, so i guess its in line for the next HASS version?
After some tinkering i've gotten a docker up with HASS core on my "production" unit, and connected it to MSR.
I also added the Configurator/file editor docker so I can edit HASS and Reactor config from the web UI without firing up Putty.
MSR, Z-Way and File editor is added as iFrames, so now i can remove some bookmarks from my browser.
Tibber and Xiaomi MI integration dropped right in at first attempt.Have to say that this looks very promising!
-
I am running HA Supervised in a Docker container on Debian on a small i5 Lenovo. Installed HACS without any problems, there are a few guides on how to do it.
It has been stable so far anyway.The only concern I have is that it seems as if the HA developers want to push users away from the Docker way of running HA over to the HA OS way.
What this means is that the requirement now is more or less a vanilla Debian with only HA in Docker. If you do not stick to this the installation becomes "unsupported".
My installation was "supported" but now I can see that it has become "unsupported" due to the Portainer installation.
My idea was to add e.g. MSR in Docker at some point in time, but maybe the Docker route will be a dead end for HA?It could be so that a HA OS installation on a VM, e.g. in Proxmox is the better choice in the longer run. The other option to only install HA OS on e.g. a fairly modern NUC seems a waste of resources to me since you cannot use it for anything else then.
I tested Proxmox and it seemed quite nice, the problem was that the old Athom PC I used was too old for the combination Proxmox/HA. So if I will go down that route I need to reinstall my i5 from scratch. Hmm.
To be honest I think it is a bit annoying that HA has complicated the setup/installation so much, not sure why they did that.
-
I saw the problem HA is solving with dockers in Domoticz.. plugins that require different versions of packages can't co-exist and tears the system down.. To me it still seems weird to move to the "OS with nothing else on it" route though..
I run it in a docker now next to several other dockers, works well.
-
Same as @PerH for me. I’ll not install anything bare metal until I’m forced too. This is a better plan from recovery and migration point for views, too. I’m regularly doing a backup of configuration to my nas (hourly and daily) and in case of a disaster I’m sure I’ll be up quickly.
-
Just for fun I decided to test and setup Home Assistant OS on two virtual machines.
The first is a HA OS VM on a Windows 10 i5 NUC with VirtualBox. Quite easy to setup, some information can be found on the HA website, I also looked at this guide.
The second VM I installed on an old Core2 PC. I installed Proxmox and then HA OS in a VM. A bit more complicated to setup but there is a good guide here. The Core2 seems ok for this setup, in comparison with the old Athom PC that did not do the job.
Both installations seem to work ok. I will test them later on with a backup of my production setup to see if that changes anything.
The Windows installation got corrupted when I had to hard reset the PC. As expected HA OS did not like that, however quite easy just to delete the VM and set it up again. I only had a test installation of HA on the VM, but as always a backup of HA is a good idea.I have not tested any USB devices (e.g. Zwave stick) since I do not use it. As far as I have understood it both should work with USB devices.
What to use? The plan is to stay with my current Debian/Docker setup since it has so far been very stable. If the HA devs continues to move away from the Docker installation I may need to reconsider this.
The other VM's could be an option for test rigs I think.
I like the Proxmox setup, it feels quite solid and is built for VM. The Windows setup feels a bit more uncertain with the MS Windows 10 automatic updates etc.
