Skip to content

Multi-System Reactor

746 Topics 7.1k Posts
  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    389 Views
    therealdbT

    Yup, many thanks to @toggledbits for the quick fix!

  • Feature Request: Latest Reactor Version Number Attribute

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    201 Views
    PablaP

    Appreciate it!

  • Odd behavior in Weekday checkmarks (MSR)

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    170 Views
    toggledbitsT

    @Crille said in Odd behavior in Weekday checkmarks (MSR):

    "Date formatting extras. The weekday and month names are derived from the JavaScript locale, so
    they do not need to be defined here." I missed that change and still have them defined in the Swedish translation and that shows correct in the UI.

    If they are defined in the locale data, Reactor will prefer that over asking JavaScript/Node.

    This is now fixed in my dev version and the fix will be in the next build. It's cosmetic only. Until that build is released, just assume the order is Sun - Sat regardless of the label (the days are handled by number, not by name). It will also fix itself next week (the bug only occurs when the most recent Sunday is in the prior month).

  • Need help with DynamicGroup reaction for dead nodes in HAAS

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    345 Views
    toggledbitsT

    Fixable. Exercise for the readers.

  • Z Wave JS - Not Connecting

    Locked Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    841 Views
    PablaP

    @toggledbits got it. So basically if you navigate to Settings -> Add-Ons -> Z Wave JS UI and on the top where it says Info, Documentation, Configuration, and Logs click Configuration. Then under Network section turn the toggle on to show unused ports (not sure if that is the correct verbiage) then add port 3000 and hit save. Once the add-on restarts it should work.

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    114 Views
    cw-kidC

    Strange, I deleted the Global Expression and created it again and now the HTTP API commands are working OK again.

    In the browser for example I now see a response like this and the variable is set with my data OK.

    {"name":"scene","expr":"","index":9,"mdt":1689950652569,"serial":22,"value":"backcam","since":1689950659980}

  • Reactor Ex Machina II (2023-July Update)

    Locked
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    200 Views
    therealdbT

    very cool. any plans for an import/export feature in the UI?

  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    175 Views
    G

    @Pabla This post inspired me.

    After poking at this a bit I went a different route and have my MSR backing up to a Github repo. The only thing it's unhappy about is backing up the storage directory due to the sheer number of files so I circumvented that and have that directory tarred into an archive and then the archive itself is backed up. Github is happy, I'm happy.

  • Possible Typo/Correction in Manual

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    118 Views
    toggledbitsT

    Yeah, that's a carry over from the Vera Reactor plugin (R4V)... the docs for MSR started from R4V and got edited, and I missed that. Apologies, but darned good sleuthing on your part to find the correct thing. You are awarded 10 XP!

  • 0 Votes
    10 Posts
    330 Views
    G

    @Pabla The original Conditions were <= .25 whereas the working version had to be flipped to >= .25. That's what ultimately made it work.

  • Reactor Update Shell Script *Use at your Own Risk*

    Locked
    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    224 Views
    PablaP

    @gwp1 If your reactor folder is /home/user/documents/reactor your tar.gz file should be in home/user/documents. But thats not what the error is showing, looks like the Reactor update file isn't in .gz compressed format, I know with certain browsers like Safari they will auto decompress downloaded files.

  • Ezlo Secure - Onboard Siren not appearing in MSR

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    131 Views
    CatmanV2C

    Hmm, looks OK to me, but I'm hardly an authority

    C

  • Couldn't Copy Few Files from Reactor Directory

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    166 Views
    CatmanV2C

    I suspect they can be ignored indeed

    C

  • Moving the IP of an HA install

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    97 Views
    CatmanV2C

    Super, thanks. Makes things easier (as I've come to expect!)

    C

  • Home Assistant add-on

    30
    3 Votes
    30 Posts
    2k Views
    K

    Restarting reactor from reactor itself after changing any global expressions or making new global expressions is doing the trick for me currently.

  • Expressions page showing old data

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    382 Views
    K

    Restarting reactor from reactor itself after changing any global expressions or making new global expressions is doing the trick for me currently.
    But I am using MSR via the unofficial addon by @mrw298 .

  • Help with Logic Routines SW1/SW2

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    382 Views
    wmarcolinW

    Hi @Pabla 🙂

    Thank you for your time, but let me try to better explain the situation I have using the air conditioner.

    My equipment can be operated/command in three ways:

    Remote control, which basically each function just turns on and off (let's call it SW1); APP on the phone, which in this case knows the status of the device by WiFi integration / Samsung cloud (SW2); Or by the dashboard mounted on Hubitat (SW3).

    I will detail the use case of the actions and impacts.

    a. Turning on the a/c through the HE dashboard (SW3), the virtual button activates the Samsung integration drive, setting the mode ON, this integration with the cloud updates the status of the APP (SW2), but the remote control thinks it is off ( SW1), as it has no integration, but the air will be turned on and it will work normally.
    b. Turning on the air through the APP (SW2), through the integration with HE, the status of the drive is modified, so my rule turns on the SW3, aligning the dashboard.
    c. The same thing happens if you use the control (SW1), the Samsung cloud is triggered, it updates the APP status, and the HE drive with the status modification triggers the rule that turns on the SW3 virtual button. In this case, the control now knows that air is connected.

    As you can see, I have a rule that when switching SW1 or SW2 or SW3, it will in ON ways inform the status change and align the 3 SW for all to be ON.

    In the case of turning off, it is the opposite way, any of the 3 SW can turn off, and a second rule makes the alignment to put the 3 SW in an OFF state.

    As our friend @toggledbits mentioned, cave-mode is the easiest, create two rules, one for each situation and everything works, that's what I have today.

    My puzzle is that since one rule is the opposite of the other, I thought of trying to have just one, using the SET and RESET situation.

    As I demonstrated, the SET is easy, because anyone with the OR condition solves, one that is triggered, turns it ON and puts all the others in the same status, now turning OFF is the complicated thing, because it changes the condition from OR to AND, that is, SW1 and SW2 and SW3 have to be ON to keep the device ON, if any of them turns OFF you have to turn OFF all the others.

    Well let's to follow the cave-mode which is easier for now, in the future our genius @toggledbits maybe create a Latch in reverse 🙂

    Thanks.

  • Can't post screen shots here now?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    294 Views
    DesTD

    I will look into it. Seems that we are having a bunch of update to do again!

  • Home Assistant push notification for Reactor version update possible?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    224 Views
    G

    @tamorgen Can you mark this as [Solved] please?

  • Testing reaction set global expression

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    234 Views
    R

    Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for clearing this up! Maybe make a note in the documentation? Most kind of expect all the actions to run when you click the "Run action now" button on the Reaction, I think. And it's even more confusing if it's also dependent on the rule being active or not.

Recent Topics