Skip to content

Multi-System Reactor

792 Topics 7.5k Posts
  • [Solved] ZWaveJSUI not responding to ZWaveJSController

    Locked
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    532 Views
    G
    @toggledbits I can confirm success. iblinds WAI with 23011.
  • warning icons missing

    Locked
    6
    2
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    410 Views
    tunnusT
    With build 22349 I'm not seeing trouble icons if entity is missing from rule's reactions, triggers seem to be fine in this sense.
  • [MSR] reactor-espresense to track ESPresense BTLE devices/beacons

    Locked
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    213 Views
    G
    @therealdb Gonna keep an eye on this as I've just implemented a slew of these around the house via MQTT in Home Assistant.
  • Reactor Start - System Crash/Restart

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    376 Views
    T
    In my exhaustion (anger? Lol), I mistyped. I’m at 22.04. I do fire an email just before the reboot. I took a break to check emails and wrap up for the day and this is what triggered it for me. If it wasn’t for this, I think I’d still be digging. I send lots of emails, perhaps too many, when different things happen. This is a great idea! I have to go look at the rule today. I thought I set a variable on reboot which would only allow one event/reboot. At least I thought about this possibility but I clearly missed something. Thanks for the consoling, gents. I’ve appreciated both of your support over the past year as I’ve slowly moved away from Vera to HASS with Reactor being the central rules engine.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    289 Views
    toggledbitsT
    @gwp1 said in Sanity check on rule: using the sun as a condition for Group reactions: My sunrise/sunset OR is simply to act as the Condition noting the sun has "changed". Yeah... doesn't work that way. between sunrise and sunset is true during the configured period, so the parent OR group is true. When sunset arrives, the first condition goes false but the second condition goes true in the same evaluation/instant, so the group remains true because both conditions were never false at the same instant, you just traded one for the other. There is no "dead period" between the two conditions, one changes to the other instantly, so the OR group never changes state (remains true forever with the conditions given). There are many choices to get to what you want. I'm going to leave it to your creativity to imagine/solve. Hint: you can do it without changing the structure of this rule or its conditions and reactions, just by choosing condition options carefully in the right places.
  • Need advice building templates for MQTTController

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    526 Views
    CrilleC
    @toggledbits A few more thoughts: I would like to parameterize primary_attribute: and temperature_sensor.units to give the user the oppurtunity to choose between for example temperature or humidity and C or F. Before I show you all my failures, is it supposed to be doable in current release? (I'm now doing it by having the same templates in one file but with different primary_attribute: and id's) I'd like to suggest more aliases for value_sensor for example atmospheric_pressure and signal_strength both with .units. Is that something you would consider or is there another way to accomplish two value_sensor in one entity? Before I show you all my failures, is it possible somehow to predefine values for light_effect? Thank you for your patience and let me know if you need me to provide more info if the answer isn't just yes or no
  • Is latest-22337 in DockerHub?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    109 Views
    No one has replied
  • MQTTController: two brokers?

    Locked
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    371 Views
    G
    @toggledbits In configuring the entity for OwnTracks... completely disregard my prior insanity. I'm finding all sorta good things BY READING ALL THE WORDS in the manual. I'll be out the rest of the day - still just poking at this.
  • And the same to you, @toggledbits

    Locked
    1
    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    116 Views
    No one has replied
  • EzloControler access credentials timeout?

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    483 Views
    I
    Reactor version: latest-22343-ef2b8f75 OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS, AMD EPYC 7262 Reactor installed vis Docker (docker-compose to be exact), version 20.10.12, build 20.10.12-0ubuntu4 Hub involved: Ezlo Plus Firmware 2.0.33.2116.2 Advanced Scenes 1.56 Yes, much better - things seem to be working now. I'd attach a log (as you mentioned there were warnings about setting undefined, among other things), but apparently I can't do that yet, so I'll stand by for directions on the data collection. Thanks for your help.
  • What am I missing with this rule not setting?

    Locked
    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    284 Views
    C
    OK, Thanks for this. I do prefer to use constraints where they work (my thinking it prevents constant evaluations when not needed). I'll be extra careful in rules that are not often setting and have long time delays where something may or may not become true. I'll move the constraints as set into condition groups and try that Update: Scrubbed the constraints and rule is set. Thanks as always. [image: 1670513268405-campervannew.png]
  • [Solved] 22337 ignoring "not between"?

    Locked
    9
    2
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    378 Views
    G
    @toggledbits This seems more appropriate. The timebox AND the OR group for Heating vs Cooling with the individual Heating and Cooling groups nested within. [image: 1670427281938-f9a1a1ce-99a4-4b90-b325-7b916c0f357b-image.png] Edited with the updated version.
  • Dimming.set 'attribute' no longer available

    Locked
    4
    2
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    211 Views
    G
    Can we mark this topic as [Solved] please?
  • [Solved] latest-22328 restart fails

    Locked
    27
    1 Votes
    27 Posts
    2k Views
    CrilleC
    Thank you both for solving this issue. I can also confirm it's working as intended now.
  • Issue with HTTP API

    Locked
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    485 Views
    E
    @toggledbits yes that was the problem, thanks on the fix. Best regards
  • Running Reactions stuck in waiting from deleted rule

    Locked
    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    191 Views
    CrilleC
    Apparently not, but I did now and everything is back to normal. Thank you!
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    268 Views
    PablaP
    @toggledbits That may be true. If so then lets change this to a feature request!
  • Action Pace Configuration MSR

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    155 Views
    P
    Thanks much for the prompt reply, I just tried it and it noticeably improved the execution of the rule.
  • Update from 22240 to 22310 failed. New Install also failed. (Windows)

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    281 Views
    tunnusT
    @toggledbits, 22310 release notes are missing from the announcements?
  • Where Used Functionality?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    253 Views
    C
    @tbully I've had this before too. Something has triggered (or not) .Being able to look up where it is present without going through all the rules would have been great. MSR has a great recent history and warnings now to help, but especially when changing things and you want to be sure you have caught everywhere things were defined. This was last in vera for me but i'm sure it will happen again as I rebuild everything and my rules become more linked together. Aside from search for this, When opening nested/closed rules in the UI, the reactions don't show without clicking edit. It does make it quite hard to open a few rules to have a quick glance at the trigger and reaction. I might be missing something, but it would be great to be able (even if an option to turn this on or off) to also see the reactions when opening a rule to check it contains what you think it should, or when quickly comparing similar rules too. [image: 1669233347933-example.png]

Recent Topics