Skip to content

Multi-System Reactor

792 Topics 7.5k Posts
  • Interface Adjustment!

    Locked
    4
    3
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    277 Views
    toggledbitsT
    @wmarcolin noice!
  • Version 22305 with ZWaveJS -- Invalid Entity IDs in log

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    190 Views
    R
    That fixed it. Thanks
  • Possible Bug With Reaction Groups

    Locked
    4
    5
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    241 Views
    G
    @pabla Logs are in UTC.
  • Dynamic Groups Controller - Filter Expressions

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    487 Views
    PablaP
    @toggledbits That seems to have done the trick! I originally removed the > because I thought without out Reactor would treat each new line as a new entry but I see that it is the total opposite. Thanks for the help!
  • Best Way to Show CPU Usage

    Locked
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    78 Views
    No one has replied
  • [Resolved] Day mode implementation question

    Locked
    31
    3
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    1k Views
    G
    @therealdb This bears investigation - thank you!
  • [Solved] Big change in my system - How to update MSR as best as possible?

    Locked
    17
    2 Votes
    17 Posts
    1k Views
    PerHP
    @gwp1 : Yes, I've seen (100s!) of those, no problem there! I just had this notion that there was some other function in place, where if a device was gone, it would prompt you "This entity is gone, select replacement here", and that this would do replacement of all uses of that entity/device. To the other discussion: My problems started when I moved ALL devices to a new system, as in all entity addresses changed. I have previously been on the same MSR version for long periods of time without any issues, so I very much doubt any "planned obsolesence".
  • Sort Array Based on Newly Added Items

    Locked Solved
    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    562 Views
    PablaP
    What a brilliant solution! I think that did the trick, the only modifications needed was to make the new_not_home and last_not_home variables global so I can use them in the original rule. Initial testing looks like this did the trick. Thanks again Patrick!
  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    610 Views
    SnowmanS
    Thanks Patrick and @Pabla for your input and suggestions.
  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    373 Views
    PablaP
    You could in your reset action add a delay then have the light turn off after said delay. But if you want the light to turn off specifically when there is exclusively no motion detected, you can add a group in your reset reaction like the screenshot below and it will only turn off the light if there is no motion detected. @toggledbits can confirm if that is the correct approach. [image: 1666806198622-cb074bbd-c7fd-45f8-a9bf-d89202dc61e5-image.png]
  • Entity sanity check

    Locked Solved
    9
    1 Votes
    9 Posts
    377 Views
    toggledbitsT
    @catmanv2 said in Entity sanity check: Out of curiousity, I assume it's mqtt package files? Yes. There's a sample config in the package, and I had to check it. All extras will be getting sample configs like that, and the documentation will in future likely also be moved or duplicated into the package as well.
  • [Solved] Group in Reset Reaction is being ignored

    Locked
    7
    1
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    657 Views
    3
    @toggledbits You are correct. I had an extra motion sensor and was planning on putting it on the opposite side. While I was testing, with three sensors in the AND group, it dawned on me that all three would have to have triggered and gone false for this to work. This won't happen if you only enter the garage a few feet and never to the other side. I ended up creating my rules exactly how your example was and it's working great. Thanks for the insight and example.
  • "device not enumerated by Maker API" in logs

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    93 Views
    No one has replied
  • How do I set parameters in Home Assistant from MSR

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    529 Views
    toggledbitsT
    Well, now that you mention it, if the data passed to Hass will accept an array of entity IDs, I see no reason not to do it. It just passes it through. Have to get the JSON right, though.
  • Using Variables in notifications

    Locked
    11
    2
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    625 Views
    MikeReadingtonM
    @toggledbits I used something like that to dampen solar panel logic. I am not "legally" allowed to hook up, but I still wanted to play with them. I still have a dumb meter and it's easily possible to end up negative for the month. I used a couple of RIB relays to turn panel groups off if the consumption target for the month was trending under what would be considered believable. (I also turn them off by the driveway entrance sensor logic on the days that I know the meter reader will show up. I don't particularly need an observant reader seeing the meter flying around backward)
  • Extras Filename/versions do not match

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    155 Views
    toggledbitsT
    Those are all correct.
  • [SOLVED] Sanity check: Groups in Reset Reactions

    Locked
    7
    2
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    359 Views
    G
    Confirmed this issue is rectified. Thank you!
  • Can a rule be used to disable other rules?

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    440 Views
    G
    @basai My approach to this has been to set a rule to determine a "thing" or "state". I then "turn on/off" other rules by looking at the status of that rule. Example: Ruleset: is temp below 40º? True for <40º, False for >40º Ruleset: do this thing if ruleset "is temp below 40º" is true (or false.)
  • "condition must be sustained for less than" -restriction not working

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    285 Views
    tunnusT
    @toggledbits in editor mode it is always correct, i.e. showing "less than", but after hitting "exit" it's showing "at least" (and functionally working as it was "at least") EDIT: it almost works as the rule starts triggered (as it should), but it also stays triggered (which it should not)
  • [CONFIRMED] Upcoming HubitatController z-wave polling feature

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    357 Views
    3
    @toggledbits said in Upcoming HubitatController z-wave polling feature: I think that's right It is correct. My polling config left the default frequency at 60000ms (1 minute) and I did not include the interval settings on my devices, of which I am polling 3 until I can get around to replacing them. Upon reactor startup, the first device in the list is polled, one minute later the second device, another minute later, the third device. Seven minutes from there, or ten minutes from the initial poll, device 1 is polled again. Thank you @toggledbits for adding this feature.

Recent Topics